Maybe they shouldn't have tracked sex of a child as compared to the weather on the day of conception or delivery of the child. To work out if kids conceived on a rainy day where more likely to be boys or girls.<p>I have a confession to make. I don't read any newspapers or listen to any tv/radio news. As they have a tendency of giving credit to anything. They'll put results taken from one study and publish it as if they are really statistically significant. One of the worst things is people who don't understand science commenting on it.<p>One study of 740 women among maybe a million times that number every year, is meaningless. They could have as easily tracked the weather and found out that 55% of the kinds conceived on rainy days were boys.