Mulve: a RIAA lobbyist's wet dream, and a Spotify killer. Wonderful. Was the current piracy regime so badly broken that this needed to happen? The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), the Gallo report, the UK's Digital Economy Act, and in particular, the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act, will all
a) seem completely warranted, and yet
b) will make even moderates presently optimistic about Spotify making copyright enforcement hardening unncecessary, despair
c) finally, the awful copyright policy we've seen pushed in 2010 (see above) will seem inadequate to all, and even harsher measures will be necessary. Throw the safe harbour / intermediary immunity out the window, allow wanton monitoring, consider making wilful downloading of infringing content illegal, bring back DRM, etc...
Three strikes? Let's make it two.<p>And if mulve had never come along? people would just learn how to conduct their business online with greater discretion. Privacy, anonymity, encryption, closed communities, being selective about which computers you let your PC connect to - hardly a bad schooling?<p>If it ain't badly broke, don't fix it.