TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Slip Coaches: Back When British Express Trains Detached Passenger Cars at Speed

176 点作者 misnamed将近 7 年前

7 条评论

ljoshua将近 7 年前
The flight path of landing planes is often directly over my home. How many times I have wished during the final approach that I could hop in an personal landing pod or sky dive out, landing in my driveway, than take the extra hour or so that is required to deplane, get to transportation, and drive home... Slip air travel anyone? :)
评论 #17271522 未加载
评论 #17272211 未加载
评论 #17273155 未加载
pjc50将近 7 年前
The Aramis PRT system of the 70s was intended to do this with individual or 4 seat cars, accelerating and decelerating to make trains. But the control systems of the time weren't quite up to it.
5DFractalTetris将近 7 年前
...But could you match a platform to a slipcoach's velocity?
评论 #17271693 未加载
评论 #17271667 未加载
评论 #17271703 未加载
评论 #17271157 未加载
评论 #17271174 未加载
myself248将近 7 年前
I always figured the solution to this problem was buses. Take a bus and drive it alongside the running train, then merge it sideways into a C-shaped train car frame that accepts it and lifts it up. Now the bus is just another train car. At another point along the route, it can be set down, and un-merge back out again, and ply the streets again.
victor106将近 7 年前
They used to do this India till at least 15 years ago.
评论 #17276788 未加载
fizzbuzzbazz2将近 7 年前
Splitting for different destinations also seems useful. If one is to walk the transfer time must be that of the slowest passengers. I lose 2 times 20 min like that twice per day.
评论 #17271705 未加载
transfire将近 7 年前
There is no reason this can't be done for modern rail systems. It would greatly improve efficiency and time schedules. But alas, innovation in rail has been very incremental (HyperLoop aside), and practically non-existent in the States.
评论 #17271393 未加载
评论 #17271507 未加载
评论 #17271387 未加载