TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Notorious Kindle Unlimited abuser has been booted from the bookstore

86 点作者 saxatrumpet将近 7 年前

11 条评论

bambax将近 7 年前
How much would it cost Amazon to assess the value of each book uploaded to Kindle? Some AI process could be trained on &quot;real&quot; vs &quot;scam&quot; books and attach a score, then humans could review the worst scores and then maybe investigate the authors who post a majority of bad books.<p>Even after the fact, once a book is generating profits in the Kindle store, one can think of many automated controls:<p>1. It shouldn&#x27;t matter that the old Kindles can&#x27;t tell the pages you&#x27;ve read (just the max page you reached), if the new ones can, because then, based on the data from the newer Kindles, one can detect books where people only read the first and last page (and then maybe investigate those books manually)<p>2. Even if no Kindle device was able to tell the pages you&#x27;ve read, if it&#x27;s possible to measure the speed at which a reader reached the last page (date book first opened - date last page read), then by comparing to similar books of similar size it should not be difficult to identify outliers<p>3. Etc.<p>My point is, for some reason Amazon doesn&#x27;t want to police itself, neither in the Kindle store nor in the general store (third-party sellers), which is bad for its brand.<p>This is puzzling because it&#x27;s irrational, and one would think Jeff Bezos is more of the hyper-rational type...<p>So a piece of the puzzle is missing, but I can&#x27;t see it.
评论 #17285465 未加载
评论 #17284013 未加载
评论 #17283712 未加载
评论 #17288444 未加载
评论 #17283694 未加载
评论 #17284585 未加载
dangoor将近 7 年前
The sucky thing about this is that the way Amazon pays out Kindle Unlimited reads is through a pool they create each month. They essentially take the size of the pool (say, $20 million) and divide by the total pages read and pay out to each author depending on how many page reads they had.<p>In other words, scammers like this are taking money directly from authors producing legitimate work.
elyobo将近 7 年前
Love the totally genuine comment there from &quot;Diamond Girl&quot; too...<p>&gt; No real content??? As if. I LOVE Chance’s books, they’re amazing!!! LOL to theFivierrr idea, his books are proper legit. You write slander or libel or whatever it’s called. You should be ashamed of your bad journalism, ever fact checked anything?!
评论 #17283915 未加载
ryandrake将近 7 年前
If you have an insufficiently moderated platform where users can upload content, and you offer money to content uploaders based on some measurement, you will get largely crap, but optimized for that measurement.
jandrese将近 7 年前
Any bets on if the drawing for the jewelery ever happened? That could lead to actual criminal prosecution I think if he wasn&#x27;t very careful with the wording.
TomK32将近 7 年前
There&#x27;s those multiple-choice adventure books where you have to either go to page 43 or 26 depending on how you want to continue the story. That might be a legitimate way to abuse the system and give the jewellery to your SO :)
seanwilson将近 7 年前
&gt; Thanks to a flaw in the Kindle platform, namely that the platform knows your location in a book but not how many pages you have actually read, the scammers can get paid for a user having “read” a book in Kindle Unlimited by getting the user to jump to the last page.<p>Seems an obvious thing that would have been taken advantage of. Is there a rational behind why they didn&#x27;t want to track something like time per page or time spent within one book? People don&#x27;t like tracking I guess but statistics like those can be interesting to readers as well.
评论 #17285178 未加载
评论 #17286421 未加载
edf13将近 7 年前
Smart stuff from the guy who worked out the scam, though.
评论 #17285536 未加载
sunstone将近 7 年前
Not to mention that some people were using this scheme to launder money, though typically with sky high book prices.
apersona将近 7 年前
Lol. The comments section in the article is pretty heated.
fifnir将近 7 年前
I&#x27;m sorry for the out-of-topic rant:<p>I got the &quot;we care about your prinvacy&quot; note, in spanish.<p>What do I have to do to convince the internet that I don&#x27;t speak fucking spanish? Yes my ip is in spain because I live here.<p>Is it really so hard for developers in 2018 to realize that IP does not mean language preference?<p>&lt;edit&gt; And also, stop spoiling spaniards with providing everything translated, this country needs to learn some english
评论 #17283652 未加载
评论 #17283658 未加载