TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

150-Year Green Card Wait for Indian Immigrants With Advanced Degrees

91 点作者 varunsaini将近 7 年前

10 条评论

djrogers将近 7 年前
This is <i>one</i> of the enormous penalties we as a nation have to pay because neither of our political parties actually wants to solve the illegal immigration issue.<p>Republicans get to use ‘illegal immigrants taking jobs’ as a stick to beat democrats with, and progressives use cries of racism to rally support amongst Latino voters.<p>Meanwhile anyone who espouses common sense ideas such as reforming our immigration policy gets called a racist and ‘anti-immigrant’.
评论 #17328551 未加载
评论 #17328466 未加载
评论 #17328432 未加载
评论 #17329523 未加载
评论 #17328374 未加载
评论 #17328427 未加载
评论 #17328607 未加载
评论 #17328847 未加载
评论 #17328755 未加载
评论 #17328752 未加载
评论 #17328611 未加载
cletus将近 7 年前
So this is the result of several factors that are at odds with each other.<p>1. There is no per-country quota on H1Bs<p>2. There is a per-country quota on EB-1&#x2F;2&#x2F;3 GCs<p>3. And this is crux of the problem: H1Bs are issued indiscriminately, most problematically to so-called bodyshops.<p>There are various proposals to fix the immigration backlog. There&#x27;s one bill that would get rid of per-country quotas. I wonder what that would do to the backlog of everyone. I kind of see this one as a nonstarter.<p>Bizarrely, it&#x27;s the current (otherwise abhorrent) administration that is the first to even talk about fixing the real problem, which is (3). H1Bs are a lottery now. When the likes of FAAMG companies can&#x27;t hire people because the likes of Infosys and Tata are flooding applications for people who will essentially become indentured servants, that&#x27;s a problem.<p>Infosys settled a visa fraud case with the US government several years ago including a payment of millions of dollars. How exactly are they still able to apply for visas?<p>There are problems with ranking applicants based on salary (or total compensation) as the one proposal would do. This would potentially drown out lower-paid STEM fields that have legitimate need with FAAMG SWEs. Then again... that&#x27;s still probably better than the current system.<p>People have also complained &quot;well you can&#x27;t hire graduates if you rank on salary&quot;. That&#x27;s true. But at the same time, are newly minted college graduates fulfilling unsatisfied demand for specialty occupation? Or just being used to lower labour costs?
评论 #17328886 未加载
评论 #17328707 未加载
评论 #17329132 未加载
temp-dude-87844将近 7 年前
How does this wait play out in real life? I doubt any company actually waits 15 years, and clearly not lengths exceeding a human lifespan, to fill a position, even if it went through the trouble of filing an I-140 and certified that zero US workers were available.<p>So what do all these applicants do in the meantime? Are they overseas? Are they in the States on dual-intent visas? Are they in some creative legal limbo?<p>If somehow, in the meantime, they obtain a green card or work permit, are they allowed to take that same position, if it&#x27;s still open -- clearly, they can accept any other position, as they&#x27;re fully allowed to work in the States, but can they take the one EB-2 and I-140 was filed for originally?
评论 #17328526 未加载
评论 #17328505 未加载
partycoder将近 7 年前
The dilemma of intolerance is that tolerating intolerance makes you intolerant.<p>Some forms of intolerance: believing in gender superiority, a caste system, exceptionalism based on ethnicity or country of origin. If you believe in those things, you might have a tolerance problem, no matter where you are from.<p>I try to be as tolerant as possible, and do not have negative views against immigration. But if you are intolerant I will have a hard time getting along if you openly express those views or if you apply those at work.
varunsaini将近 7 年前
I am one who can be in this boat and don’t know what to do yet.
评论 #17328200 未加载
mankypro将近 7 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Lifeboat_ethics" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Lifeboat_ethics</a>
known将近 7 年前
97% people in India are poor by global standards <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;idronline.org&#x2F;addressing-inequality-in-india&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;idronline.org&#x2F;addressing-inequality-in-india&#x2F;</a><p>They&#x27;ll wait for 250 years
ng12将近 7 年前
Isn&#x27;t it a false assumption that immigrant workers should eventually get Green Cards? The whole point of the H1B system is to temporarily fill shortages of skilled workers, not to be a path for permanent immigration.
评论 #17329535 未加载
matz1将近 7 年前
Not a bug: working as intended
pfarnsworth将近 7 年前
Is it really discrimination if the system is already known to have a per-country limit, and yet more and more people from that country continue to file for Green Cards? Indians who come to the US these days know for a fact there is a 10+ year wait for a Green Card, so they&#x27;re the ones taking their chances. If they scream discrimination, I call BS on that.<p>It sucks that the system is the way it is, and I think a point-based system like Canada is far more efficient, but it&#x27;s not discrimination. If there are already known rules, and one particular country comes in an adds a massive amount of applications, you can&#x27;t turn around and yell discrimination.
评论 #17328649 未加载
评论 #17328739 未加载
评论 #17328545 未加载
评论 #17328500 未加载
评论 #17328363 未加载