TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google admits its new smart speaker was eavesdropping on users (2017)

25 点作者 otp124将近 7 年前

3 条评论

atonse将近 7 年前
Hmmm yet again, I am inclined to not believe this. How is it that these bugs always end up invading our privacy, and not the other way round? (&quot;Google&#x2F;Facebook admits a bug in their system reduced the data they could collect&quot;). Because those bugs are true bugs as far as these companies are concerned, and they&#x27;re squashed ASAP.<p>This is like when Facebook had an oopsie about leaving the microphone on, &quot;oh no sorry it was just a bug.&quot; Right, when you abused an iOS API to leave your app running all the time, a side effect was that you also recorded all the conversations on the phone. These companies are becoming a cancer on our privacy.
评论 #17339682 未加载
programmarchy将近 7 年前
&gt; My Google Home Mini was inadvertently spying on me 24&#x2F;7 due to a hardware flaw<p>Are we really supposed to believe this?<p>Charitably, Google does not take privacy seriously, because they release products that have gaping flaws they neglect to test or correct. It would have been trivial for a test engineer to see a unit is collecting data on conversations without the wake word.<p>Or uncharitably, Google does not take privacy seriously, because they are releasing spyware, and just lie when they get caught.<p>Edit: In this case, maybe some leeway can be given because they were test devices, but it still makes me wary of having these type of things in my home.
评论 #17339672 未加载
评论 #17339787 未加载
评论 #17339749 未加载
评论 #17339679 未加载
flashgordon将近 7 年前
By this point, is the the only difference between breaches by Google (and its ilk) and Equifax is that in the case of the former we can opt out using it?