TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Should you accept that as a developer you have small impact in company?

4 点作者 lackoftactics将近 7 年前
Currently I work in small size software house and I feel that I don&#x27;t have any impact on the products and I try to accept this fact, fortunately, I have my side projects. It&#x27;s quite annoying that if you ask harder questions about company and vision, you get answers like &quot;It&#x27;s none of your business&quot;. Sad thing is that it&#x27;s cool company and have really open culture and this still happens so it would be even worse somewhere else.<p>Previously I worked in product house where I was the only developer for a while and still all my ideas were not even considered. I wasn&#x27;t supposed to have anything to say, just code and keep servers alive.<p>Lately, I started thinking about it more intensively as I have written the GitHub library with almost 500 stars on GitHub and my blog post went viral on medium. I forgot that I have more talents than Ruby on Rails development like knowledge about product development, marketing, SEO, creativity, writing skills, psychology.<p>It doesn&#x27;t seem like it bothers my other co-workers and they are not so interested in doing side projects, startups, product development, writing. We had chat while ago about starting something on our own and they were happy with what they are doing here.<p>All the software companies are now the same and if you don&#x27;t get to the higher position you will be a cog in the machine even if it&#x27;s a small company.<p>So back to the question. Should we accept this as a fact that we are only developers and hope for the better future if we raise in the ranks?

2 条评论

danielvf将近 7 年前
I&#x27;ve been able to have plenty of project, engineering, and technical influence in companies while not technically being in charge of anything. In fact, I prefer it this way. I don&#x27;t like day to day managing, and I like the freedom to pick which problems I&#x27;m thinking about. And since I have zero care for getting any credit, I&#x27;m not threatening anyone and I stay outside the power fights.<p>----<p>There&#x27;s a several thousand year old story about this.<p>Some junior executives joined a large multi-national corporation. While still in their training, they saw some process improvements wanted to make in their own areas.<p>They asked their friendly local VP if they could make the changes. He said &quot;If this goes wrong, the CEO will blame me, not you. Heck no.&quot;<p>So then they asked their immediate boss they could do a small, ten day trial run with the new process, and metrics that lined up with what their immediate boss was managing for. He, seeing little risk, and potential upside, gave the go ahead for the trial.<p>The new method worked out great, was rolled out to the whole rest of the training department, and everybody was happy.<p>- Some people&#x27;s primary management objective is to not get in trouble with their boss. They do this by reducing uncertainty to the point they actively work against positive change, because it adds uncertainty. These aren&#x27;t the people you want to be asking permission from.<p>- A lot of times, people low in the org chart have the actual authority. As long as you are friends with them, and don&#x27;t make them look bad with the stuff you do, you can get away with a lot of improvement.<p>- Good ideas need good packaging. You really need to express them in frame of reference of the person or people who are making the decisions. If you are dealing with someone with profit and loss responsibility, frame your solution in terms of making more money or spending less, if you are dealing with a person with schedule responsibility, frame it in terms of reducing variability. Don&#x27;t frame your problems in developer terms unless you are dealing with a developer who is actively programming.<p>- You can do a whole lot more experimentation if you can keep the cost of failure lower.<p>- Most people in a large company never really think about the big picture of the company. If you do, and can clearly express how your ideas fit into them, you can have a big impact. Often when you&#x27;ve really done your thinking and found the solution to a problem, you&#x27;ll hear your ideas repeated by people all over the company. You don&#x27;t even have to fight the fight.
davelnewton将近 7 年前
There is a disconnect between the claim that it&#x27;s a company with &quot;open culture&quot; and answers like &quot;it&#x27;s none of your business&quot;.<p>I dispute your premise from the outset.
评论 #17355204 未加载