TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Intel CEO resigns after relationship with employee

287 点作者 trequartista将近 7 年前

32 条评论

ckastner将近 7 年前
Relationships among employees are very hard to keep concealed -- especially so when you&#x27;re in a very exposed position, as a CEO is. At some point, somebody is going to notice something.<p>If this is the case, then I&#x27;m pretty sure that this knowledge had reached the board long before. Rumors spread fast, after all.<p>That leaves me to wonder as to the timing of this action. Krzanich received a lot of flak over the past months... it&#x27;s not entirely unthinkable that the board was sitting on this information and only now used it to get rid of Krzanich without making it look like it&#x27;s one of the other major issues he could technically be blamed with.
评论 #17366003 未加载
评论 #17365481 未加载
评论 #17365989 未加载
评论 #17365520 未加载
InTheArena将近 7 年前
Intel is in serious trouble right now.They accidentally gaffed recently and stated that their goal was &quot;to keep AMD from getting more then 10-20% of the server market&quot; while they deal with a whole bunch of engineering and fab problems with their current generation of chips. They are also looking down the barrel of Apple abandoning Intel, and for the first time in two decades, unleashing a true X86 competitor to the marketplace.<p>All of these are good reasons the board might want him gone.<p>My only other point is that even on Hacker News, everyone assumes it&#x27;s a female subordinate (count the &quot;she&#x27;s&quot; in this thread). Not that I have any inside knowledge, but it tells you something in how this policy is interpreted.
评论 #17365641 未加载
评论 #17365539 未加载
评论 #17366162 未加载
评论 #17365497 未加载
mathattack将近 7 年前
It was stupid of him to do. The executive suite of large companies is very Game of Thrones. Why leave a knife around for someone to stab you in the back? Of course people knew. And then they were “shocked!!” to formally find out.<p>This is a serious thing. What if you knew about the relationship, and the other person was promoted over you?<p>I worked at a place where 2 colleagues had an open&#x2F;secret relationship. One was senior but there wasn’t a reporting relationship so everyone looked the other way. When the senior exec weighed in on the junior’s promotion, he lost all credibility in the organization.<p>If the CEO does this, they lose the entire organization.<p>I guess he can always go to Oracle.
评论 #17366678 未加载
评论 #17366639 未加载
评论 #17367895 未加载
sbinthree将近 7 年前
There is no way you would fire a CEO you actually wanted in place because they had a consensual relationship with a subordinate <i>in the past</i>. Why are US companies always so aggressive about moralising these issues? No one would take issue if he carried a gun at work. Why is it that corporate morals rule?
评论 #17365046 未加载
评论 #17365038 未加载
评论 #17365069 未加载
评论 #17365967 未加载
评论 #17365508 未加载
评论 #17368189 未加载
评论 #17364998 未加载
评论 #17365075 未加载
评论 #17365014 未加载
评论 #17365181 未加载
评论 #17366204 未加载
评论 #17365344 未加载
评论 #17365032 未加载
评论 #17365378 未加载
评论 #17365004 未加载
评论 #17365411 未加载
评论 #17365728 未加载
评论 #17369927 未加载
评论 #17366208 未加载
评论 #17365067 未加载
nodesocket将近 7 年前
I&#x27;m I the only one who finds it appalling that the NY Times mentions #metoo and Harvey Weinstein as if to insinuate his consenting relationship was anything like what Weinstein did.<p>Honestly, I get why these policies exist, but sometimes it feels heavy handed to fire somebody for having a consenting relationship at work. After all, when you work long and hard hours often times coworkers are the people you get to know best and your inner circle.
评论 #17368272 未加载
评论 #17367951 未加载
评论 #17368392 未加载
评论 #17368187 未加载
dokein将近 7 年前
So obviously relationships are bad when there&#x27;s a power dynamic, and between different management levels is a common subset of this.<p>However it feels like many people are spending more and more time at work, and it also seems cruel to say: &quot;you cannot get to know anyone romantically during 50-75% of your waking day.&quot;
评论 #17365183 未加载
评论 #17365179 未加载
评论 #17365479 未加载
评论 #17365107 未加载
评论 #17365102 未加载
评论 #17365394 未加载
评论 #17365065 未加载
评论 #17366176 未加载
评论 #17365112 未加载
评论 #17365073 未加载
评论 #17366217 未加载
评论 #17365091 未加载
rglover将近 7 年前
Sure, there&#x27;s a policy, but who cares? People need to quit meddling in the affairs of others.<p>If a relationship is consensual what&#x27;s the issue? If we&#x27;re spending a significant part of our waking hours at work, it should be a baked in assumption that at some point, some coworkers are going to end up in a romantic relationship together. Hell, the majority of my significant romantic relationships started out as consensual workplace flirting.<p>It should only ever be an issue when that relationship causes trouble for the business.
评论 #17366888 未加载
评论 #17367084 未加载
gm-conspiracy将近 7 年前
Man, Larry Ellison handles stuff like this way better.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sfgate.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;article&#x2F;Oracle-Boss-In-High-Tech-Soap-Opera-Ellison-2859701.php" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sfgate.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;article&#x2F;Oracle-Boss-In-High-Tech...</a>
评论 #17367083 未加载
m1el将近 7 年前
So he quits because of a &quot;relationship&quot;, but not because of insider trading?<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessinsider.com&#x2F;intel-ceo-krzanich-sold-shares-after-company-was-informed-of-chip-flaw-2018-1" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessinsider.com&#x2F;intel-ceo-krzanich-sold-share...</a>
评论 #17365169 未加载
__aeneas将近 7 年前
Other article which isn&#x27;t so sparse on detail (the NYT will probably improve the article linked in the OP later): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;06&#x2F;21&#x2F;intel-ceo-brian-krzanich-to-step-down-bob-swan-to-step-in-as-interim-ceo.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;06&#x2F;21&#x2F;intel-ceo-brian-krzanich-to-...</a>
partycoder将近 7 年前
At Microsoft, the Chairman and CEO Bill Gates married the project manager for Microsoft Bob and Encarta, Melinda.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Microsoft_Bob" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Microsoft_Bob</a>
评论 #17367268 未加载
dv_dt将近 7 年前
Bill Gates got away with it... but then maybe having a lot of ownership in the company protected him. Well that and he married Melinda.
评论 #17366730 未加载
评论 #17366740 未加载
评论 #17367226 未加载
fuscy将近 7 年前
Intel had a pretty rough year with discovered exploits, poor PR and serious production issues for their tech.<p>How to discreetly solve the above issues? Have the CEO resign due to a reason that is not related in any way to his capacity of being a CEO. Put new CEO in the driver&#x27;s position and have the board tell him where to go.<p>Usually CEOs have a nice package, even with a resignation, with some stocks and goodies so most likely everyone won in this case.
ggg9990将近 7 年前
Board clearly wanted him out anyways. Probably because he let AMD catch up so much.
code4tee将近 7 年前
A board doesn’t fire its CEO because they went on a few dates with someone a while back—even if that’s against company policy.<p>Getting the popcorn out to see how this unfolds...
评论 #17365068 未加载
评论 #17365319 未加载
评论 #17365064 未加载
评论 #17365123 未加载
评论 #17365159 未加载
outside1234将近 7 年前
So my question is: Was the female employee also fired? If not, why not?
评论 #17365247 未加载
评论 #17365105 未加载
评论 #17365110 未加载
评论 #17365133 未加载
deagle50将近 7 年前
I&#x27;m curious why the board used this old infraction as the justification. As if being allowed to use the standard &quot;leaving to spend more time with family&quot; story would be getting off too easy... Or maybe something something vague would arouse more suspicion? I suppose there is value in an acute, yet unrelated to performance story.
joveian将近 7 年前
The Oregonian has a better article than any I&#x27;ve seen posted here so far:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.oregonlive.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;index.ssf&#x2F;2018&#x2F;06&#x2F;intel_ceo_brian_krzanich_resig.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.oregonlive.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;index.ssf&#x2F;2018&#x2F;06&#x2F;intel_...</a>
jl2718将近 7 年前
If it’s a company rule not to fraternize, punishment should go both ways.
mathattack将近 7 年前
At a prior (Fortune 500) company the head of HR got sacked for having sex with his secretary in his office the weekend. (Security walked in on them) Poor judgment.
评论 #17368700 未加载
arcaster将近 7 年前
Jesus, why would you throw that kind of power and money away for that...<p>Regardless of your gender, orientation... whatever... keep it in your pants regarding the workplace!
sergiotapia将近 7 年前
Another, let&#x27;s say &quot;interesting&quot; CEO resignation. So many in such a short timespan. I wonder why this is happening all of a sudden.
bitL将近 7 年前
So so so stupid... I hope the next gen of managers would completely abstain from any kind of romantic relationships with fellow employees given what is happening now. Their inability to think clearly and exert self-control damages companies way too much, even if they are seduced by persons seeking their own profit or being set-up by their frenemies knowing their weaknesses.
评论 #17365645 未加载
DoofusOfDeath将近 7 年前
It&#x27;s probably a good rule of thumb for a person in authority to assume anyone under him%her
balozi将近 7 年前
OK: Shipping billions of bug-ridden chips NOT OK: Dipping your pen in the company ink
heisenbit将近 7 年前
And this has nothing to do with the troubled 10nm process...
nortiero将近 7 年前
The other employee has been fired, too?
alottafunchata将近 7 年前
Let the man live!
yuhong将近 7 年前
This reminds me if Eric Schmidt left Google because of this debacle: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;08&#x2F;30&#x2F;us&#x2F;politics&#x2F;eric-schmidt-google-new-america.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;08&#x2F;30&#x2F;us&#x2F;politics&#x2F;eric-schmidt-...</a>
poster123将近 7 年前
What is the Intel non-fraternization policy? What romantic relationships are banned?
评论 #17364992 未加载
评论 #17364944 未加载
评论 #17364989 未加载
评论 #17367442 未加载
lord_ring_11将近 7 年前
Why is this even worth discussing?
评论 #17365297 未加载
评论 #17365164 未加载
YorkshireSeason将近 7 年前
Interesting though experiment: Let S be the set of all humans. Remove any human from S who had at least one pair of ancestors (no matter how far in the past) that had a boss&#x2F;subordinate relationship that is now deemed &#x27;inappropriate&#x27; in large western countries. How many humans would be left in S?<p>Conjecture: Zero.<p>Does that say anything interesting about humans?
评论 #17365174 未加载
评论 #17365231 未加载
评论 #17365751 未加载
评论 #17365130 未加载
评论 #17365305 未加载
评论 #17365157 未加载
评论 #17366029 未加载
评论 #17365134 未加载
评论 #17365252 未加载
评论 #17365672 未加载