TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Git Tower Goes Annual Subscription

11 点作者 pixeloution将近 7 年前

6 条评论

pixeloution将近 7 年前
Personally a bit frustrated to see desktop applications go to subscription models where years can now go by without upgrades but I&#x27;m forced to continue to pay to use the app.<p>If I&#x27;m unsure on how long before there will be a worthwhile upgrade, am I paying $80 for this app, or $400? Its a bit like being told that you can buy an item but won&#x27;t know its real cost upfront.<p>I understand subscription models where they offer something that&#x27;s ongoing (remove disk, sync, whatever) but I find this model annoying and its forced me to change software I use quite a bit in the last few years (most recently moving off 1password).<p>Charge me more if you have to, but stop this &quot;keep paying forever&quot; madness.
mistersquid将近 7 年前
I&#x27;m also disappointed by Fournova&#x27;s decision to go subscription, especially since they are choosing a pay-to-play subscription model.<p>According to Julian Rothkamp of Fournova, Git Tower is moving to &quot;standard subscription: you’ll have access to Tower as long as your subscription is active. Access to Tower ends when a subscription expires&quot;, [0] which in my opinion is not an appropriate model for software that leverages open source technology such as Git.<p>I think a more reasonable model would be what Drew McCormack calls the &quot;cash cow&quot; subscription model where users pay for a 12-month subscription and will<p>&gt; get new features and bug fixes for one year, but after that you are on your own again until you make a new purchase. You won’t get any new features, or even bug fixes, but you can keep using the last copy of the app that you downloaded. [1]<p>With the &quot;cash cow&quot; model users pay only after they&#x27;ve decided from themselves that the developer has provided enough value to justify the cost of another yearly subscription. Instead, Fournova has chosen a pay-to-play subscription model which means that after the first year, users simply have to trust that another year&#x27;s subscription fee will be worth it.<p>Additionally, pay-to-play turns Git Tower&#x27;s users&#x27; workflow familiarity into a financial dependency&#x2F;liability and this seems ill-advised in a world where software and platforms can shift with little to no predictability.<p>For my part, I am going to wait 12-18 months before even trying Git Tower 3 because I don&#x27;t want to become dependent on the new features with no recourse except to pony up US $69 in 12 short months. As a side-note, I think this would not be as much an issue if Git Tower&#x27;s annual pay-to-play price was closer to US $30.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.producthunt.com&#x2F;posts&#x2F;tower-3-0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.producthunt.com&#x2F;posts&#x2F;tower-3-0</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;@drewmccormack&#x2F;a-cash-cow-is-on-the-agenda-138a11995595" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;@drewmccormack&#x2F;a-cash-cow-is-on-the-agend...</a><p>EDIT: Remove first sentence. Add comma to second sentence. Move first citation marker.
tristanpemble将近 7 年前
I have been a long time user of Tower, and am supportive of and maintain annual subscriptions for several pieces of software that are essential to my workflow. I am a software developer and I understand the need for a subscription model for certain applications and businesses. There is not a single application on my computer I have not happily paid for a license fee or subscription to if required.<p>I will not be purchasing a subscription for Tower. This model does not make sense for this application.
评论 #17411259 未加载
j_chodorowicz将近 7 年前
I&#x27;m also disappointed, it seems there will be no software soon with perpetual monthly fees. It especially doesn&#x27;t feel right in this case, because it&#x27;s basically UI for open source tool and it doesn&#x27;t offer (and need) really any server&#x2F;sync&#x2F;multi device features. I will look for alternatives, SourceTree maybe.
nsuinteger将近 7 年前
Really dissapointed with this approach... Hope they’d release a standalone version later down the line. This is literally forcing the customer to pay whether they use it or not.<p>r.i.p standalone software licenses
iluzone将近 7 年前
Saying that I have a problem paying $60&#x2F;year to support product that I&#x27;m using daily is kinda ridiculous. Of course if it doesn&#x27;t have value, don&#x27;t pay. I&#x27;ve been using tower daily for last few years. While I can do everything I need from console, there are cases where using UI is just faster. So yeah, I&#x27;ll be happy to pay.