TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Income mobility has been rising fastest in Britain

56 点作者 randomname2将近 7 年前

4 条评论

Malarkey73将近 7 年前
It&#x27;s just really difficult to understand what this means.<p>The first big caveat is that 1990s to 2010s stops at the financial crisis. Due to austerity the UK has since then seen the greatest period of wage stagnation of all the advanced nations except Greece. But employment has remained high. So whilst the report is a picture of time before the crash its not clear to me what has happened since.<p>Second - Yes I think I do care more about the overall level of poverty and inequality. I&#x27;m not happy if people are moving in and out of destitution.<p>Third - I really don&#x27;t understand how to square this analysis with the obvious fact that half as many people own their own home now as in the 80s. For 25-34 year olds its gone from 65% to 27% during the period of this study . What&#x27;s that downward income mobility? I sthat a good thing? Or does that not count as it&#x27;s not income?<p>.. I just don&#x27;t really know what this is saying..?
评论 #17472784 未加载
评论 #17472290 未加载
评论 #17472562 未加载
zucchini_head将近 7 年前
The article doesn&#x27;t touch upon education much at all, which I believe is a central part of social (im)mobility. Problems arising in society later on will simply stem from the early life of members of society, not afterwards. It&#x27;s a common principle that education is the key to societal equality, in some way.<p>All I can offer is my story on this. I&#x27;ve lived in the UK all my life in all sorts of regions from those of lower working class (my hometown) to my recent years where I&#x27;ve lived in rather upper-class &quot;lawyer-doctor-business owner&quot; regions. The difference in education between the lower and upper classes is stark. Let me explain.<p>Upper-class children are enrolled in schools of like-minded high-achievers full of entrance exams and interviews (provides a non-zero floor to student &quot;intelligence&#x2F;quality&quot; at the school), and strict rules&#x2F;discipline. They are further pushed towards degrees leading to higher paying careers - Finance, Medicine, Law, by their families and the schools themselves. Their families purchase extra tutoring, they have smarter parents (this is a positive feedback loop across generations!) to guide them, and so on...<p>Compare this to lower-class children, who, in the UK (and i&#x27;m pretty sure everywhere else essentially) are enrolled in &quot;state schools&quot; (free). These schools have no entrance requirements (there is zero floor for student quality), the families almost never purchase extra tutoring, and are much less pushed towards &quot;meaningful&quot; degrees. The schools offer equal environments to the best and the worst of students.<p>This imbalance in education (and by extension upbringing in general) is what seeds everything else. And indeed, in the past few years the UK government has recognized all the above. How they plan of solving it? The reintroduction of &quot;Grammer Schools&quot;! These are state schools (still), but _do_ have enterance requirements, thereby allowing lower-class students of high intelligence&#x2F;quality a chance to separate from the worst students in state schools and enroll in a more challenging education. There is much debate in the UK whether this will work, or will simply just allow children of rich families to more-often&#x2F;further separate themselves from poor families. Time will tell.<p>That&#x27;s my 0.02c anyway: Education.
评论 #17471222 未加载
评论 #17471396 未加载
评论 #17471294 未加载
评论 #17473665 未加载
评论 #17472387 未加载
seanhandley将近 7 年前
Gavin Kelly is associated with Downing Street. It&#x27;s in the conservative government&#x27;s interest to downplay social issues caused by its policies.<p>I smell a conflict of interest.
评论 #17472541 未加载
dijit将近 7 年前
Reads like an opinionated piece which is cherry-picking it&#x27;s stats.<p>The report he&#x27;s citing most heavily is indeed about social mobility, but social mobility isn&#x27;t always &quot;up&quot;, social mobility measured by OECD is the state of flux and certainly by itself does not correlate at all with improvements in social class from the lower levels.<p>The author also talks about &quot;more equal&quot; not equating to &quot;more mobile&quot; and he&#x2F;she is absolutely correct, however the way it&#x27;s phrased makes me believe he&#x2F;she is intending to change the mind of the reader as to whether more equal is a good thing.<p>Overall I&#x27;m not coming to the same conclusion as the author from the source material. Flux is bad if you&#x27;re middle&#x2F;working class are ending up in the poor class. Which is happening from what I can tell anecdotally.