TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Conduit 0.5.0 and the future of Conduit

93 点作者 pyronicide将近 7 年前

3 条评论

CBLT将近 7 年前
&gt;Conduit will become Linkerd 2<p>I have not been following this space, is anybody willing to provide background?<p>It looks like linkerd developers re-wrote their Scala service in Rust, citing smaller footprint and lower p99 latency as wins from this approach. As a JVM-hater myself, I fully believe this conclusion, but my mind is open to change. Certainly there&#x27;s at least some nuance? Furthermore, to my knowledge the Netflix plumbing model puts the middleware as java libraries rather than java services, avoiding going through another JVM like Linkerd does. Are stacks like Java and Ruby sufficiently poorly suited for middleware services that developers should be rewriting-in-rust away from them?
评论 #17475599 未加载
评论 #17475794 未加载
评论 #17475747 未加载
评论 #17476083 未加载
评论 #17476773 未加载
neya将近 7 年前
Wow, on a side note, when I saw it I almost thought it was the scammy Israel company that used to thrust adware&#x2F;malware through its toolbars back then.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;malware.wikia.com&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Conduit_Search" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;malware.wikia.com&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Conduit_Search</a>
评论 #17477649 未加载
tybit将近 7 年前
One of the biggest draws of Linkerd over Envoy (prior to Consul Connect at least) was that it seemed more feasible to use outside of Kubernetes.<p>Conduit however is tightly coupled to Kubernetes as I understand, which isn’t really addressed in this blog post.
评论 #17476975 未加载