TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The flash crash of May 6 explained - one human, thousands of algorithms involved

6 点作者 erikstarck超过 14 年前

3 条评论

yummyfajitas超过 14 年前
Here is the original report. Far more useful, in my opinion.<p><a href="http://media.ft.com/cms/5b341edc-cd80-11df-9c82-00144feab49a.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://media.ft.com/cms/5b341edc-cd80-11df-9c82-00144feab49a...</a>
erikig超过 14 年前
You have to love the way these electronic futures (e-Mini S&#38;P's - 50x leveraged) are geared. One trader's 4.1bln stone in the pond triggers a chain of ripples that causes $900+bln losses. Its gotten so extreme that "The current average daily implied volume for the E-mini is over $140 billion, far exceeding the combined traded dollar volume of the underlying 500 stocks." - wikipedia<p>That said I don't think the problem lies in leverage. I'm sure if this Waddell &#38; Reed trader had tried to pull a fast one in the trading pits where they trade the 'big boy' S&#38;P futures (500x leveraged), the effect would have been much more muted because fellow traders would have pinpointed the seller and reacted accordingly. When the trades are coming in electronically, the 'enemy is faceless'...<p>For some related fun listen to the squawk in the pits:<p><a href="http://catastrophist.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/ben-lichtenstein-sp500-pit-squawk-may-6/" rel="nofollow">http://catastrophist.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/ben-lichtenste...</a><p>(The excitement/fear is palpable - bear in mind Ben is a professional watching billions wasting away)
sammcd超过 14 年前
I'm interested in the headline, but really don't want to have to register to read the content.
评论 #1748725 未加载
评论 #1748805 未加载
评论 #1748834 未加载
评论 #1748908 未加载