TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Any obvious reason for duckduckgo vs. Google speed difference on mobile?

12 点作者 fdsak将近 7 年前
Over mobile network (4G) I am unable to open duckduckgo from time to time and google is as usual very fast. I checked duckduckgo is not down and on my desktop duckduckgo works fine. I was thinking if there is any priority assigned to google requests by my network carrier and intentionally blocking duckduckgo. Using firefox over android, Pakistan

9 条评论

notjtrig将近 7 年前
I would guess more of Google&#x27;s landing page is cached, and it&#x27;s a smaller page.<p>I&#x27;m getting Google in 0.5-3 secounds, DuckDuckGo in 3-4 secounds, StartPage in 2 secounds. USA 4G 3:30AM<p>On another note, both Google and DuckDuckGo seem to link directly to search results but actually redirect your broswer to capture the link you clicked. StartPage links directly to search results.<p>I&#x27;ve asked DuckDuckGo about this and they can&#x27;t provide a sastifactory answer. Maybe someone could clue me in why that redirect is nessicary, but until then I consider them untrustworthy.
评论 #17489835 未加载
评论 #17521741 未加载
smt88将近 7 年前
I also noticed this and stopped using DDG because of it. My assumption was just that scaling is hard and DDG wasn&#x27;t as good at it as Google is.
评论 #17492145 未加载
DarkWiiPlayer将近 7 年前
I just tested this myself and, while google loads its DOM content almost twice as fast as duckduckgo for me (1.2s vs 0.7s), that&#x27;s still way within a reasonable time for a webpage. For comparison, youtube took me 3.5 seconds to load the DOM content.<p>That said, it may still be some difference like browser caching, or maybe android even does that. My tests were on a Windows PC using chrome.
评论 #17488436 未加载
bradknowles将近 7 年前
You could try doing a traceroute from your mobile phone to both Google and DDG.<p>The number of hops and latency you see in traceroute may help you figure out what kind of CDN and global server load balancing that DDG is doing versus what Google is doing, and thus why their respective web pages are the speeds they are.
评论 #17512258 未加载
rurban将近 7 年前
Google serves content from a data center near you, others just from 1-2 central servers. You cannot beat the shorter connection.<p>That&#x27;s btw Google&#x27;s trick, from the very beginning. It was not pagerank or any better algorithms, it was purely massive investments getting into all the data centers worldwide.
评论 #17513607 未加载
siproprio将近 7 年前
Duckduckgo is slow for me as well. I stopped using it because of this.<p>If you&#x27;re looking for an alternative to Google that is faster than duckduckgo, try Bing. It is still slow, but faster than duckduckgo.
ggg9990将近 7 年前
Could be that Google is paying your ISP for traffic prioritization.
评论 #17495718 未加载
segmondy将近 7 年前
Google has more money and resources than duckduckgo. I suffer through duckduckgo because I rather anyone than Google. At this point, I might start giving bing a try.
mkbkn将近 7 年前
In my case,<p>DDG: 4-5 seconds.<p>Google search: 1-2 seconds.<p>Carrier - Airtel (4G) in India.