TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

US tries to kill pro-breastfeeding policy

54 点作者 staktrace将近 7 年前

5 条评论

sincerely将近 7 年前
The linked article basically restates the original NYTimes article, with less detail: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;07&#x2F;08&#x2F;health&#x2F;world-health-breastfeeding-ecuador-trump.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;07&#x2F;08&#x2F;health&#x2F;world-health-breas...</a>
评论 #17495097 未加载
hackerpacker将近 7 年前
The odd thing is, even after 10 minutes I can&#x27;t find the WHO resolution in question, only lots of opinion articles. I mean I don&#x27;t care if you want to breastfeed, anywhere anytime, just wanting the whole story here. Were they banning alternatives or something?
评论 #17495179 未加载
评论 #17495099 未加载
hguhghuff将近 7 年前
What’s with all the immature puns in the article trivializing the subject matter?
dvfjsdhgfv将近 7 年前
Nestle has its own page about WHO&#x27;s International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nestle.com&#x2F;ask-nestle&#x2F;health-nutrition&#x2F;answers&#x2F;who-code" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nestle.com&#x2F;ask-nestle&#x2F;health-nutrition&#x2F;answers&#x2F;w...</a><p>Basically, they say that this code is not a law so they don&#x27;t follow it, but they have a different code, an internal one, and they stick to it.
BrissyCoder将近 7 年前
&quot;The Ecuadorian delegation, for instance, was expected to introduce the resolution but was weaned off the idea after the US threatened...&quot;<p>Lol. Weaned.
评论 #17495518 未加载