TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A Fear of Lawsuits Really Does Seem to Result in Extra Medical Tests

105 点作者 montrose将近 7 年前

12 条评论

rayiner将近 7 年前
&gt; Any law that limits the cases where patients can sue, or the amount of money they can collect, is likely to lower medical use in the hospital by less than the 5 percent they measured in their study.<p>The telling thing about laws to address malpractice liability is that they typically are focused on capping large verdicts. But such laws are illogical: generally, large verdicts will be awarded where a doctor screwed up and caused the most damage. Cases with large verdicts are the most meritorious ones, and the ones where limiting liability is least likely to eliminate over-testing that does not contribute to quality of care.<p>If states actually wanted to address the costs of defensive medicine, they would do something like create affirmative defenses for doctors who adhered to certain established testing protocols.
评论 #17620217 未加载
评论 #17621006 未加载
评论 #17621764 未加载
评论 #17622049 未加载
评论 #17622931 未加载
评论 #17620381 未加载
jl2718将近 7 年前
Extra tests... the cost of diagnostics is a tiny fraction of the cost of doctor time, and most patients just go to the doctor to get the test. The doctor is an irellevant gatekeeper 90% of the time. How about we start talking about ‘extra’ doctor visits because patients don’t have access to tests. There are some diagnostics where this gatekeeping is literally causing a public health crisis. ‘Extra tests’ are only an issue because of the untreated disease they reveal, which costs insurers money to treat. This ‘concern’ is all part of their lobby.
评论 #17620033 未加载
评论 #17623268 未加载
评论 #17619267 未加载
评论 #17621752 未加载
评论 #17621362 未加载
评论 #17623937 未加载
评论 #17623044 未加载
评论 #17619277 未加载
评论 #17623667 未加载
mattnewton将近 7 年前
So make tests cheaper - sounds like an opportunity that gets a win for everyone without political miracles.<p>(I don’t know the market I am talking about at all, but) Maybe they could incentivize cheap tests by capping the cost per test that can be administered without some large red tape process. The market will provide tests under that cap where possible, so they can be administered more frequently &amp; frictionessly. Patients are thoroughly tested, Doctors cover their butts, and test supply companies get to keep selling lots of tests.
评论 #17620241 未加载
patrickg_zill将近 7 年前
Wait until the NY Times finds out that c-sections have greatly increased because of high-dollar awards like the one that made John Edwards (yes the politician) a millionaire...
评论 #17619124 未加载
评论 #17619155 未加载
评论 #17623692 未加载
评论 #17619655 未加载
dahdum将近 7 年前
Aren&#x27;t a lot of these costs baked into all services due to malpractice insurance itself? If these doctors could be sued by some of their patients (the families), they still need to cover the cost of that insurance.<p>Beyond that, once defensive medicine is the status quo, why would they make a choice to not order their usual defensive panels? They aren&#x27;t paying for them themselves.
评论 #17619397 未加载
zelon88将近 7 年前
I thought medical errors were the third leading cause of death in the U.S. with 10% of all deaths attributed to medical error.<p>With that error rate, is it fair to say that the extra tests are truly &quot;unnecessary?&quot;
评论 #17627009 未加载
howard941将近 7 年前
Link to the study: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nber.org&#x2F;papers&#x2F;w24846" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nber.org&#x2F;papers&#x2F;w24846</a>
dhdhshd将近 7 年前
Bone marrow biopsies suck. And on top of that I have to be thankful I don’t have cancer while the bills keep coming.
subhobroto将近 7 年前
I see no issue with Extra Medical Tests. More data points do not hurt a diagnoisis if a proper scientific method is followed.<p>The primary issue here is the resulting cost.<p>As the article points out: &quot;about 26 percent of every dollar spent.&quot;<p>You probably won&#x27;t complain paying 26 cents for a $1 popsicle, but if the same popsicle cost you $100, you might be upset paying $26.<p>But is not the bigger question: Why is the popsicle $100 when it could have cost $1?<p>Here is a useful chart to show where the money goes: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qph.fs.quoracdn.net&#x2F;main-qimg-d68aea3ca1e466f166752e261b9e28d3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qph.fs.quoracdn.net&#x2F;main-qimg-d68aea3ca1e466f166752e...</a><p>Where do you think malpractice costs fit there?<p>I personally feel sad everytime malpractice fears enter the discussion of costs - its a tiny, ignorable portion right now of total expenses.<p>However, to a typical layperson, it sounds like a big deal to worry about but actually distracts the attention costs should be getting.<p>As a result, I have tried to cover it here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;Why-does-one-believe-that-malpractice-insurance-is-the-primary-reason-for-US-health-care-being-so-expensive" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;Why-does-one-believe-that-malpractice-...</a><p>Real input from real practitioners in the industry in the real world.<p>Sure, Malpractice overhead exists but it&#x27;s analogous to a drop in the ocean. There is severe waste elsewhere that need to be handled first.<p>It&#x27;s a nosebleed in a patient hemorrhaging blood through a punctured artery.<p>The argument that ordering extra tests offer doctors &quot;additional defense&quot; in case of a lawsuit is absolute hogwash. If anything, the test results put the doctor at a further disadvanatge wrt defense because they had an additional datapoint they should have considered in their diagnoisis but did not.<p>The primary issue with Healthcare in the U.S. is cost - for those who have the money and the will to spend it, it&#x27;s one of the best in the world. A lot of the rich visit the US for their Healthcare needs.<p>Healthcare in the U.S. is optimized for profit: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;What-makes-the-US-healthcare-system-so-expensive-Why-is-the-US-so-expensive-compared-to-Canada&#x2F;answers&#x2F;33451192" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;What-makes-the-US-healthcare-system-so...</a><p>This is very wrong as it encourages short term profit seeking behavior which is absolutely the opposite of what healthcare should be (eg: C Sections being preferred over natural but long childbirth)<p>A for-profit system does not help the doctor&#x2F;provider either (although it gives an illusion of it) - in such a system, the patient&#x27;s only recourse is to sue the doctor&#x2F;provider for damages instead of both parties focusing on the root cause which brought the patient to the doctor&#x2F;provider in the first place.<p>Extra Medical Tests might be suboptimal but the real pain points are the marginal costs of each test.<p>Tests in the U.S. are extremely expensive. There is no standardized pricing for any test in the U.S. unlike the rest of the world.<p>While the rest of the world has pretty much agreed, for example, that a blood group test might be no more than $10 (In India, it costs 20 cents upto 70 cents at current INR-USD exchange rates), in the U.S. depending on which lab you go to, your insurance coverage, your ability to pay and other factors, you might be billed anywhere from $0 - $2000.<p>That is completely insane.<p>Also, labs in the U.S are not setup to take requests from customers directly. There are kits you can order and all that<p>Everytime I try to send a blood sample to a lab on my own, the lab staff seem to be lost - they want my insurance information, my EHR information, my NPI ID and when I explain to them I am not a doctor they ask me to provide my physcian&#x27;s who ordered the test. (my physcian didn&#x27;t order the test - I did).<p>I have had a few labs bill me outrageous out of network fees because the lab tests were not ordered by an in network provider (because I ordered them and I am not a doctor) and the amount of calls and paperpushing I had to do to correct the billing has made me just give up and let a doctors office handle this.<p>I can read a lipid panel. I don&#x27;t need to go to a doctor&#x27;s office to drive in traffic, wait an hour or more just to draw my blood and have it sent to a lab and then have the doctor read the panel to me. I read spreadsheets every hour of the day. I know what mean median and mode is and the lab result often offer these values anyways as part of the report.<p>I just need the test report.<p>Now, if my HDLs are too high and I cannot figure out why, sure, I do need to discuss this with a professional.<p>The solution to this madness?<p>An &quot;all payer rate set&quot; system. EVERYONE pays the same for the same procedure. Who pays for the care, while important, comes later, not before.
评论 #17621398 未加载
评论 #17627040 未加载
briandear将近 7 年前
Is there empirical evidence for “Defensive Medicine?”<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pubmed&#x2F;19201500&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pubmed&#x2F;19201500&#x2F;</a><p>“The net effects of medical malpractice tort reform on health insurance losses: the Texas experience”<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pmc&#x2F;articles&#x2F;PMC5701901&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pmc&#x2F;articles&#x2F;PMC5701901&#x2F;</a>
joshuaheard将近 7 年前
If a doctor is sued for malpractice, that means they made a mistake. If they are performing extra tests to avoid malpractice, that means they are performing extra tests to avoid making mistakes. That is a good thing.
评论 #17620295 未加载
评论 #17620297 未加载
评论 #17620326 未加载
评论 #17620282 未加载
评论 #17620301 未加载
评论 #17620268 未加载
评论 #17620257 未加载
评论 #17620289 未加载
sandworm101将近 7 年前
&gt;&gt; In the federal government and in states, there are frequent proposals to limit medical liability, but there have been no serious efforts to eliminate medical malpractice rights altogether.<p>Damb right. Take away a patient&#x27;s right to hold doctors accountable and things go south very quickly, at least in a for-profit systems.<p>&gt;&gt;But American doctors often rail against the country’s medical malpractice system, which they say forces them to order unnecessary tests and procedures to protect themselves if a patient sues them.<p>The patient can only sue if the patient has been harmed. They aren&#x27;t performing the extra tests in case just wakes up and decides to sue them. They perform the extra tests so that they don&#x27;t miss something that could harm the patient so badly that they sue.<p>Doctors also forget that, again only in the US system, patients often <i>must</i> sue. A harm caused by malpractice isn&#x27;t always covered by insurance. Patients need to find the money somewhere. Or if an insurance company does cover, the insurance company will then sue the malpracticing doctor (google &quot;subrogation&quot;).<p>A few years ago several states had liability caps ready to become law (iirc $250k). Then a young woman lost both her breasts after a mixup in test results caused her doctor to recommend a double mastectomy. But at least she could still function relatively normally and the injury was not a financial burden. Imagine the costs associated with a 20yo confined to a wheelchair for the next 60+ years. Setting aside medical expenses, 250k buys you maybe four or five converted vans. While some cases are rightly suspect, many of the multi-million dollar settlements really do get spent on legitimate costs.
评论 #17618940 未加载
评论 #17618828 未加载
评论 #17618818 未加载
评论 #17623742 未加载
评论 #17618867 未加载
评论 #17619100 未加载