TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

2018 Fields Medal and Nevanlinna Prize Winners

111 点作者 heinrichf将近 7 年前

9 条评论

cs702将近 7 年前
For those who don&#x27;t know, Constantinos Daskalakis, one of the winners profiled, proved that finding a Nash equilibrium (for example, in an economy) is a PPAD-complete problem: if anyone discovers an efficient algorithm for finding Nash equilibria, such an algorithm could be used for efficiently solving all other problems in the PPAD complexity class. PPAD problems are widely considered to be intractable. No algorithm is known for solving them with running time bounded by a polynomial function of input&#x2F;problem size. The implications in many fields, starting with economics, are clearly significant. Daskalakis&#x27;s prize is well-deserved.<p>There is a fantastic introductory MIT video lecture on this work by Daskalakis himself available on YouTube.[a] His enthusiasm and passion in that video lecture are contagious -- matched only by his ability to explain his work in an intuitive manner. Highly recommended for those HNers who have computer-science or economics backgrounds and are interested in computational complexity but are not yet familiar with Daskalakis&#x27;s work.<p>[a] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=TUbfCY_8Dzs" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=TUbfCY_8Dzs</a>
评论 #17664269 未加载
beambot将近 7 年前
It bums me out that the fields medal is largely considered the top prize in mathematics, yet it has age restrictions. To people outside the field, this means that significant developments may go underreported.<p>Edit: Let me address the down votes &#x2F; polarization on this comment: Ageism in the most esteemed prize of a particular field seems obviously wrong to me. Is there a better alternative available? (That said: kudos to the winners! Truly great achievements all around.)
评论 #17663552 未加载
评论 #17662989 未加载
评论 #17665060 未加载
评论 #17663489 未加载
评论 #17662980 未加载
评论 #17662965 未加载
评论 #17664919 未加载
评论 #17663871 未加载
评论 #17662911 未加载
ddoran将近 7 年前
As all winners are once again male, it brings Maryam Mirzakhani&#x27;s achievements [1, 2], and tragic passing to mind once again [3].<p>I&#x27;m not suggesting that these winners are not deserving, nor suggesting there is bias. I am looking forward to the day a second woman wins the prize.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newyorker.com&#x2F;tech&#x2F;elements&#x2F;maryam-mirzakhanis-pioneering-mathematical-legacy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newyorker.com&#x2F;tech&#x2F;elements&#x2F;maryam-mirzakhanis-p...</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14793217" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14793217</a> [3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14776357" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14776357</a>
heinrichf将近 7 年前
Funny bit in Venkatesh&#x27;s interview:<p>&gt; Accustomed to meeting the highest of standards, he saw his dissertation as mediocre. Quietly, Venkatesh started eyeing the exit ramps, even taking a job at his uncle’s machine learning startup one summer to make sure he had a fallback option.
Carioca将近 7 年前
As a side note, Caucher Birkar&#x27;s medal was stolen less than half an hour after the award[1] (link in Portuguese)<p>1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;g1.globo.com&#x2F;rj&#x2F;rio-de-janeiro&#x2F;noticia&#x2F;2018&#x2F;08&#x2F;01&#x2F;iraniano-tem-medalha-fields-roubada-apos-recebe-la-no-rio.ghtml" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;g1.globo.com&#x2F;rj&#x2F;rio-de-janeiro&#x2F;noticia&#x2F;2018&#x2F;08&#x2F;01&#x2F;ir...</a>
评论 #17666754 未加载
angrygoat将近 7 年前
Australian media coverage of Akshay Venkatesh&#x27;s Fields medal: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.abc.net.au&#x2F;news&#x2F;2018-08-02&#x2F;fields-medal-aussie-genius-akshay-venkatesh-wins-prize&#x2F;10062218" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.abc.net.au&#x2F;news&#x2F;2018-08-02&#x2F;fields-medal-aussie-ge...</a><p>He graduated from the University of Western Australia at 16 with honours in Pure Mathematics.
评论 #17664089 未加载
评论 #17665037 未加载
LeanderK将近 7 年前
I find it always a bit sad that I have to accept it that whatever I&#x27;ll do, I can&#x27;t reach the genious of their work.<p>Especially Scholze seems like a very nice guy. I hope he continous his very productive (and hopefully fun!) journy through mathmatics.
评论 #17664904 未加载
norepicycle将近 7 年前
Scholze&#x27;s win has been predicted for quite a while now, as it turns out. He&#x27;s a number theorist of stunning originality primarily known for developing a new kind of geometry, that of <i>perfectoid spaces</i>, for arithmetic purposes.<p>Here&#x27;s an interview with him that will be accessible to nonspecialists:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=J0QdTYZIfIM" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=J0QdTYZIfIM</a><p>At a higher level, here&#x27;s an appraisal of his work by a professional in a closely related area:<p><pre><code> It&#x27;s not often that contemporary mathematics provides such a clear-cut example of concept formation as the one I am about to present: Peter Scholze&#x27;s introduction of the new notion of perfectoid space. The 23-year old Scholze first unveiled the concept in the spring of 2011 in a conference talk at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. I know because I was there. This was soon followed by an extended visit to the Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques (IHES) at Bûres- sur-Yvette, outside Paris — I was there too. Scholze&#x27;s six-lecture series culminated with a spectacular application of the new method, already announced in Princeton, to an outstanding problem left over from the days when the IHES was the destination of pilgrims come to hear Alexander Grothendieck, and later Pierre Deligne, report on the creation of the new geometries of their day. Scholze&#x27;s exceptionally clear lecture notes were read in mathematics departments around the world within days of his lecture — not passed hand-to-hand as in Grothendieck&#x27;s day — and the videos of his talks were immediately made available on the IHES website. Meanwhile, more killer apps followed in rapid succession in a series of papers written by Scholze, sometimes in collaboration with other mathematicians under 30 (or just slightly older), often alone. By the time he reached the age of 24, high-level conference invitations to talk about the uses of perfectoid spaces (I was at a number of those too) had enshrined Scholze as one of the youngest elder statesmen ever of arithmetic geometry, the branch of mathematics where number theory meets algebraic geometry.) Two years later, a week-long meeting in 2014 on Perfectoid Spaces and Their Applications at the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in Berkeley broke all attendance records for &quot;Hot Topics&quot; conferences. </code></pre> - Michael Harris, &quot;The Perfectoid Concept: Test Case for an Absent Theory&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.math.columbia.edu&#x2F;~harris&#x2F;otherarticles_files&#x2F;perfectoid.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.math.columbia.edu&#x2F;~harris&#x2F;otherarticles_files&#x2F;pe...</a>
评论 #17663953 未加载
mlthrowaway1953将近 7 年前
Is the Fields Medal going to still be relevant in 10 years, when most of the the major mathematical discoveries are made by deep learning and deep reinforcement learning systems? Already systems are learning to reason about concepts [1] and of course there is classical work on proof checkers [2]. It&#x27;s very likely that the 2028 Fields medal will be awarded to a programmer, not some mathematical super-genius (assuming that the committee is fair, and not biased against machines).<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;1806.01261" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;1806.01261</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Four_color_theorem" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Four_color_theorem</a>
评论 #17664552 未加载
评论 #17664031 未加载
评论 #17664033 未加载
评论 #17676163 未加载