TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

W3C Says HTML5 Isn’t Ready for the Web

10 点作者 niyazpk超过 14 年前

8 条评论

nitrogen超过 14 年前
<i>...until then, officials say Flash and Silverlight are still going to remain approved and viable web technologies.</i><p>Who are these officials that approve of Flash and Silverlight as web technologies superior to HTML5? I've never heard of a Flash working group at the W3C. The closest I found is someone asking for W3C involvement in 2008:<p><a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/311802/w3c-involvement-in-flash-silverlight" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/311802/w3c-involvement-in...</a>
rimantas超过 14 年前
The whole story of HTML5 says W3C is not ready for the Web.
andymorris超过 14 年前
I wonder how much place there is for such a slow-moving organisation in the incredibly fast-paced internet ...
heresy超过 14 年前
Good thing it isn't really up to them.
riddle超过 14 年前
This is really awful journalism. Read a rebuttal from “HTML5 evangelist” here: <a href="http://remy.tumblr.com/post/1261575750/hold-off-on-deploying-html5-in-websites" rel="nofollow">http://remy.tumblr.com/post/1261575750/hold-off-on-deploying...</a>
malandrew超过 14 年前
Seriously!?<p>The articles cites an "official" of the W3C and not the name of a person. Was it someone of important such as Ian Hickson or was it just some bureaucrat or intern?<p>Who made these statements matters greatly and defines the line between news and non-news. This is complete non-news unless it was a person highly involved with defining or implementing the spec.<p>The fact that the author cited Silverlight smells very fishy to me.<p>This title and the entire article is just pure unadulterated linkbait.
jimwise超过 14 年前
Without agreeing or disagreeing with the unnamed official, I have to admit that HTML5 feels a little like HTML3 to me -- it's following up a lean markup language (HTML2, HTML 4/XHTML 1.0) which was explicitly defined as an application of a well-defined general purpose language (SGML, XML), with a new version which is not so defined, and which contains a bunch of features which everyone wants right now, but which feel a little shoe-horned into the new standard (anyone remember HTML 3 Math mode?).<p>I suspect HTML 6 will be a lot more interesting, being the same sort of orthogonalization of the parts of HTML5 which actually got implemented by browsers that HTML 4 was for the mess that was HTML 3...
lenni超过 14 年前
Is it me or are some words missing in the 2nd paragraph? It makes it hard to follow the article.
评论 #1767214 未加载
评论 #1767216 未加载