IMO, most of these are very ill-posed questions. The questions are:<p><i>1. P = NP?<p>2. What is computable?<p>3. What is intelligence?<p>4. What is information?<p>5. (How) can we build complex systems simply? </i><p>Except for the first question, there is no way to determine if any given answer is an acceptable answer. The 2,3,4 are asking for definition and you can provide anything arbitrary suits your needs at hand or mood at the time. The question has no clear constraint on which answer is admissible.<p>I'd say this article is perfect example of how <i>not</i> to pose questions! Asking a good question is a lot of hard work and author simply hasn't done the homework here. A great example of asking good question is, of course, Hilbert's 23 questions. He had to survey the field deep and wide and craft each question such that answer can be verified, if one was ever proposed.