TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Thingd is building a structured database of every object in the world

42 点作者 freejoe76超过 14 年前

14 条评论

Groxx超过 14 年前
&#62;[signing in]: <i>It's easy: just connect your Facebook or Twitter account</i> [and no other means]<p>So "easy" is not allowing me to make a login <i>not</i> tied to everything else.<p>Anyone with an account care to inform me / us what you can do with an account? Just like / want it, or add thingds, or...? I'm interested, but the site contains no info <i>about</i> the site aside from the TOS and privacy policy.<p>I should really make a throw-away set of accounts on a handful of social sites, just to get around crap like this. If they allowed straight OAuth or OpenID instead of <i>Twitter</i>-hosted OAuth, maybe I'd use it. But nobody does that.
评论 #1776586 未加载
评论 #1781291 未加载
lubos超过 14 年前
Joel Spolsky predicted this project 10 years ago :)<p>"When you go too far up, abstraction-wise, you run out of oxygen. Sometimes smart thinkers just don't know when to stop, and they create these absurd, all-encompassing, high-level pictures of the universe that are all good and fine, but don't actually mean anything at all."<p><a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000018.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000018.html</a>
troymc超过 14 年前
Any website or web service with a database of "things" (with attributes) is a competitor to Thingd: WorldCat, IMDB, gdgt, Google Merchant Center, Zappos, CNET reviews, Etsy...<p>Good luck Thingd --- you'll need it!
rglullis超过 14 年前
It's one of those ideas that seem so obvious and that has the potential to change the world, but it is <i>highly</i> dependent of having critical mass. Technologically, it is very simple to implement it. One doesn't need much more than something like CouchDB, and you could have users changing things even from the admin interface.<p>With job4dev (shameless plug), we have something very similar, applied to job listings and company info. We created a "wikipedia for jobs", but lots of the curating needs to be done by hand. We are automating as much as we can, using as many APIs as possible, but there's still the need for human involvement.<p>The problem is, you need to have people <i>wanting</i> to use this. It's the ultimate chicken-and-egg problem. I could see this working if there is some sort of incentive, or even if it ties itself to Mechanical Turk. Without that, it is no different than Freebase, dbpedia, or Aaron's Infogami.
terra_t超过 14 年前
How's this better than Freebase or dbpedia?
评论 #1776405 未加载
dirtyaura超过 14 年前
Thinglink ( <a href="http://thinglink.com" rel="nofollow">http://thinglink.com</a> ) has tried several approaches in this space. Originally they offered this very abstract kind of "URL for things" service, then they pivoted to be more a social network around things, then they pivoted to be a social network for designers and people who like designer clothes and other designer objects.<p>Now, their final pivot was in my opinion marvelous, as it went to very basics and offered a super-simple service to tag things in photographs. It's still operating in a same space "to URLify real world objects", but it offers an immediately useful service, for example for fashion bloggers.
stcredzero超过 14 年前
This reminds me of Bruce Sterling's "Internet of Things."<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_of_Things" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_of_Things</a><p><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3857739359956666768#" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3857739359956666768...</a>
jasonjei超过 14 年前
At the very heart of it, it could map every object to its BOM including carbon based lifeforms. Imagine if every object were a class, including humans. The atom could be a basic super class, and you could map out various dependencies and object superclasses (e.g, Oxygen &#60; Atom &#60; Base). And it might even work with non physical things (Capitalism &#60; EconomicTheories).
评论 #1776521 未加载
评论 #1776476 未加载
praeclarum超过 14 年前
All these tags mean the same thing to me.<p>3.75 inches 3.75 inches tall 3.75 x 3.75 x 5.75 inches 3.75 x 4.5 x 7 inches<p>The problem with human entered / non moderated data is that these lists will become longer and longer over time and the database will not understand that they all mean the same thing. Joins will be impossible and its relevance fades.
rxin超过 14 年前
Isn't this what semantic web is about?
评论 #1776493 未加载
评论 #1776497 未加载
评论 #1777400 未加载
评论 #1776621 未加载
derefr超过 14 年前
If they don't stop at just describing the <i>semantic</i> knowledge that a person would derive from the experience of objects, but instead also include the <i>process</i> knowledge—in a rigorous, possibly <i>algorithmic</i> form—then it would be the world's biggest MOO.
ntoll超过 14 年前
This is very similar to FluidDB (Fluidinfo, the creators of FluidDB have recently closed series A funding with some great backers).
spoon16超过 14 年前
How does this compare to Freebase?
评论 #1776399 未加载
LordLandon超过 14 年前
If only 5th Cell released Objectnaut, they'd have a great start!