TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Winner’s Curse? On pace, progress, and empirical rigor [pdf]

28 点作者 craigjb将近 7 年前

3 条评论

charmides将近 7 年前
The summaries of the case studies in Section 2 was disturbing, to say the least. I sometimes think about the NIPS consistency experiment from a few years ago, which I think also speaks very negatively of the current state of academic ML research. I agreed with all of the authors' suggestions to solve this mess and I think many of them need to be implemented urgently.
marmaduke将近 7 年前
The suggestions for empirical evaluation are great, but would have to be insisted upon by reviewers, often chosen by authors and complicit in promoting the larger methodology at stake. I’ve seen this happen in methodology publications several times.<p>It makes sense though for companies to do this evaluation, and a ML PaaS that automates those empirical evaluations across a range of methods might have a uniquely useful service.
insickness将近 7 年前
What&#x27;s ML?
评论 #17802633 未加载