TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Securing web sites with HTTPS made them less accessible

11 点作者 jwfxpr将近 7 年前

4 条评论

r3bl将近 7 年前
Original article discussed here (87 points, 46 comments): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=17707187" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=17707187</a>
Freak_NL将近 7 年前
&gt; Google, Wikipedia<p>Caching Google makes no sense beyond some static resources. Wikipedia can be made available off-line, just not by using a man-in-the-middle server. This may make sense for a school with limited connectivity to do.<p>&gt; That’s great for modern browsers, but not everyone has the option to be modern. Sometimes they’re constrained by old operating systems to run older browsers, ones with no service-worker support: a lab full of Windows XP machines limited to IE8, for example.<p>You don&#x27;t have the option to run legacy browsers <i>and</i> expect everything to work.<p>Just don&#x27;t use a legacy proprietary OS if you want to go on-line with it. Either install a free (as in gratis, but libre makes sense too) operating system, pay for the windows upgrades, or scrap the computers.
评论 #17798842 未加载
mehrdadn将近 7 年前
Regarding the caching problem, is there no way to trust a locally signed certificate that your caching server uses so that you can cache over HTTPS?
评论 #17798800 未加载
moviuro将近 7 年前
1. webpages are fat, and no many care [0] Some other recent HN submissions compared page weight to the number of words in Moby Dick - and it&#x27;s just as bad as one can think.<p>2. Blaming HTTPS is stupid. Intercepting http without the user knowing was a bad practice to begin with. Setting your own computer to use an HTTPS proxy sounds reasonable, though I understand it&#x27;s quite a PITA. Having the user jump through difficult and scary messages could be a good feature IMO: &quot;<i>Setting up an https proxy can compromise your information such as bank account numbers, your passport information, your religious and political penchants, etc.</i>&quot; As for technological solutions for one&#x27;s home or organization: see Squid, which does provide examples [1].<p>[0] Wikipedia does care actually as it uses local cache a lot, and text-only articles such as <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Project_Xanadu" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Project_Xanadu</a> used only 271 kB; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;United_States" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;United_States</a> is around 5MB)<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.squid-cache.org&#x2F;ConfigExamples&#x2F;Intercept&#x2F;SslBumpExplicit" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.squid-cache.org&#x2F;ConfigExamples&#x2F;Intercept&#x2F;SslBum...</a>
评论 #17798833 未加载
评论 #17798787 未加载