TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

No, Google, We Did Not Consent to This

243 点作者 kushti超过 6 年前

15 条评论

adrianmonk超过 6 年前
From the article:<p>&gt; <i>Google might agree to let a random online shopping company scan what I’m typing into Gmail, but I did not agree.</i><p>Google might, in the sense that they could start, but Google doesn&#x27;t do (and never has done) what is described.<p>First of all, Google has never let companies scan what you type. It did let companies target based on content of messages, but that involves advertisers sharing targeting information with Google, not Google sharing email content with advertisers.<p>Second of all, even that stopped last year. From the Google announcement:<p>&gt; <i>G Suite’s Gmail is already not used as input for ads personalization, and Google has decided to follow suit later this year in our free consumer Gmail service. Consumer Gmail content will not be used or scanned for any ads personalization after this change. This decision brings Gmail ads in line with how we personalize ads for other Google products.</i><p>( <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.google&#x2F;products&#x2F;gmail&#x2F;g-suite-gains-traction-in-the-enterprise-g-suites-gmail-and-consumer-gmail-to-more-closely-align&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.google&#x2F;products&#x2F;gmail&#x2F;g-suite-gains-traction-in...</a> )
评论 #18204689 未加载
评论 #18204767 未加载
leereeves超过 6 年前
Can we really continue to claim that we&#x27;re unaware Google, Facebook, and other web companies are monitoring everything they can and sharing the information they collect, sometimes for profit, sometimes accidentally, and sometimes compelled by legal orders?<p>This isn&#x27;t merely a legal technicality hidden in the terms of service. We know they&#x27;re doing it, and by continuing to use the service we are consenting, however unhappily.
评论 #18201959 未加载
评论 #18202511 未加载
评论 #18201899 未加载
评论 #18204579 未加载
评论 #18202333 未加载
评论 #18202244 未加载
评论 #18201983 未加载
评论 #18203649 未加载
评论 #18202563 未加载
评论 #18202212 未加载
Meekro超过 6 年前
Countless companies every year hire security auditors, and get back a 100-page report in 8 point font filled with vulnerabilities, many of them marked &quot;severe&quot; or &quot;critical.&quot; Forcing companies to then publicize those reports will be burdensome and counterproductive.
评论 #18202102 未加载
评论 #18202600 未加载
评论 #18202544 未加载
rwestergren超过 6 年前
Apparently unpopular opinion: an internally-discovered vulnerability with no evidence of abuse is not a breach and does not require public disclosure.
评论 #18202080 未加载
评论 #18201976 未加载
评论 #18203039 未加载
评论 #18202029 未加载
评论 #18202024 未加载
评论 #18202243 未加载
评论 #18202311 未加载
评论 #18202715 未加载
评论 #18202496 未加载
评论 #18202357 未加载
评论 #18202910 未加载
评论 #18202198 未加载
评论 #18204142 未加载
评论 #18202175 未加载
评论 #18202451 未加载
amarant超过 6 年前
whats up with the contradictory first point the article is making?<p>1) This data privacy glitch is just like Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica scandal, except it isn’t.<p>well, if its not, then why even bring it up? that part smells like sensationalism to me..<p>things doesn&#x27;t get better when we realize there are no indications of any actual leaking of anyones anything.<p>The bug this article refers to was pretty bad, and googles handling of it was indeed poor. but this is just bad journalism.
评论 #18202016 未加载
thelasthuman超过 6 年前
&quot;There’s no quick fix here.&quot;<p>I think people are thinking to small. Imagine if you could own your data profile and &quot;invest&quot; it into websites or services. Everyone builds their services to accept this same &quot;profile&quot; formatting and the user takes it where they pleases.<p>This would mean small upstarts can compete with google and Facebook (who right now have a huge head start on having all this data) by having a better UX.<p>right now, everything is trapped in all these different walled gardens. I see it like your cellphone only being able to call cell phones of the exact make and model of your own.
评论 #18202995 未加载
评论 #18202532 未加载
outside1234超过 6 年前
Google is great about disclosing everyone else&#x27;s zero day flaws tho!
mbostleman超过 6 年前
I suspect that the government will feel compelled to get involved here and I&#x27;m guessing the default ask of the public is that they do. But is a class action an option? Given that there&#x27;s no evidence of a breach, does that means there&#x27;s no actual damages to claim?
imhelpingu超过 6 年前
Google is the quintessential evil tech corporation, and the federal government should prevent them from retaining the power they currently hold over the economy and society as a private autocratic monopoly.
slenk超过 6 年前
Should we really be giving Bloomberg our traffic when everything points to them fabricating information in the Super Micro supply chain article?
throw2016超过 6 年前
This is the classic &#x27;emperor has no clothes&#x27; moment but some &#x27;loyal subjects&#x27; still pointing to imaginary clothes.
relyio超过 6 年前
I wish Google would let me pay to just have 0 ads and maximum privacy. I would pay a lot for that and I would be a happier user since all my pet peeves seem to come from them dumbing down products so they can fit ads.<p>YouTube Red is a good start, hopefully this spreads.
评论 #18206879 未加载
pleasecalllater超过 6 年前
This happens again and again...<p>a. oh no!!!<p>b. nobody will go to prison<p>c. a programmer will be fired<p>d. managers will get bonuses<p>e. nobody will change the way they write programs, process data, etc.<p>f. go to point a
jhabdas超过 6 年前
Huge ad for WhatsApp just below the fold. Not only is it ironic given the subject matter, it&#x27;s not blocked by Brave.<p>Also, this has got to stop mentality is too soft. That time passed when Uber pulled the wool over everyone&#x27;s eyes while the CEO stepped down.<p>We need more Captains, less crew.
jhabdas超过 6 年前
Huge ad for WhatsApp just below the fold. Not only is it ironic given the subject matter, it&#x27;s not blocked by Brave.