> Three Republican senators have sent a letter to Google today demanding the company hand over an internal memo based on which Google decided to cover up a Google+ data leak instead of going public as most companies do.<p>That's a loaded first sentence. Here's another way of writing it: "Three Republican senators have sent a letter to Google today asking the company to please provide internal memo based on which Google decided to not disclose a Google+ bug that could have leaked data instead of going public as very few companies would."<p>Or break it up if that's too wordy. ZDNet and the writer of this article should be ashamed of themselves. How much more clearly can you out yourself as biased garbage?<p>To the contents of the letter itself [0], just answer the 8 questions straight up, and give the memo. Doesn't appear like a witch hunt quite yet. On questions 3, 4, and 5 just make it clear that software bugs are rampant, many have the ability to get bad things when exploited, and on 6 either inundate them with a deluge of security bugs or explain that there are probably thousands. On #7, the answer better be an emphatic "yes" or I will be very disappointed.<p>If it becomes more political, there needs to be legal requirements for disclosing all security vulns (instead of just exploited ones) or they need to recognize it's untenable to ask for them. Can't have it both ways and just pick a company's vuln because of an article about them and not ask other companies for theirs.<p>0 (PDF) - <a href="https://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/4852b311-0953-4ac8-ac43-a91dde229cc1/E300DA0C7659678AE0AE37AEB9746200.thune-wicker-moran-letter-to-google-10.11.18.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/4852b311...</a>