I was reading a healthline artice and saw that the post had been medically verified by a doctor.<p>What are more sites like this where the posts have been reviewed and have references?
<a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience</a> might interest you.<p>"The panel is an informal group of redditors who are either professional scientists or those in training to become so. All panelists have at least a graduate-level familiarity within their declared field of expertise and answer questions from related areas of study. A panelist's expertise is summarized in a color-coded AskScience flair."<p><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/askhistorians" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/askhistorians</a> are also fairly good at citing.<p>Both communities are self-accountable to an extent - If a poster makes a mistake or controversial comment, the other qualified members of the community are likely to correct them or provide a rebuttal.
Bruce Schneir's crypto stuff is read by people who participate in NIST algorithm competitions. Maybe that's a good indicator. Look for blogs in your subject field where names you trust comment and respond?<p>Review is a pretty specific word. Do you think it's really a good fit for blogging? I don't.<p>Theconversation.com is curated, but non-blog non-peer-review semi-academic writing. It's by academics and research people with cites and comments. Maybe it's more suitable? There are about five editions, each sponsored by a national or local science funding agency, donations, tertiary institutions.<p>I know this is a non sequitur maybe, but I just think "reviewed blog" is pretty... Wierd. Maybe you've defined a niche I didn't realise existed?<p>Get the .com domain name before it's gone...
Strictly speaking, there are no blogs that have been reviewed by professional experts.<p>If an author is going to have their work reviewed, and approved, by an outside expert then they may as well submit it to a publisher so that it can be cited by others.