TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Flickr: Let’s be candid

4 点作者 erickhill超过 6 年前

2 条评论

rococode超过 6 年前
Here&#x27;s the blog post on this:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.flickr.net&#x2F;2018&#x2F;11&#x2F;01&#x2F;changing-flickr-free-accounts-1000-photos&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.flickr.net&#x2F;2018&#x2F;11&#x2F;01&#x2F;changing-flickr-free-acco...</a><p>At first glance it seemed like a way to bring in more money, but the points they bring up actually seem fairly reasonable.<p>The rough tl;dr is:<p>1. Giving a free terabyte to every user brought in lower-quality content as people came just for free storage, hurting Flickr&#x27;s mission of being a site for quality content by photographers &#x2F; artists<p>2. Subscriptions help them make money from the product instead of the users (I don&#x27;t really buy this one, they don&#x27;t have any reason to stop selling user data just because of this change)<p>3. They want to remind people that file storage costs them a fair chunk of money to keep running, and it&#x27;s not something that&#x27;s magically free
artwr超过 6 年前
Where have the promise of unlimited storage for free gone? I guess only Facebook offers you to store as many pictures as you will throw at it. But retrieval might not be easy.<p>Snark aside, I am not sure they can be blamed for trying to survive. After all those costs add up, and without a profitable ads business behind, it&#x27;s unclear how Flickr could survive otherwise.<p>Are there any other popular businesses which currently offers a significant amount of media storage in a free account?