TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Facebook’s GraphQL gets its own open-source foundation

379 点作者 bodecker超过 6 年前

10 条评论

burtonator超过 6 年前
I did a huge heads down on GraphQL vs AppSync vs Firebase for an app I&#x27;m building around document collaboration, annotation and sync for people working with PDFs and web content (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;getpolarized.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;getpolarized.io&#x2F;</a>) - it&#x27;s kind of like an offline web browser.... anyway.<p>GraphQL is super awesome at what it does but it&#x27;s definitely not designed for rapid prototyping applications.<p>The thing about GraphQL is that it&#x27;s middleware. It&#x27;s designed to act as really nice glue between multiple backends.<p>It solves a lot of nice problems like over-fetching too much data, calling too many APIs, etc.<p>The problem is that you really don&#x27;t need these to get an app shipped immediately.<p>The REAL sweet spot for GraphQL is for a company like Netflix or Facebook where you have 1500 APIs and tons of problems with data over-fetch and you have the time to sit down and do things right.<p>I think I&#x27;m going to end up going with Firebase just because you can bang something out FAST and get it shipped.<p>It&#x27;s not going to be perfect but you can ship an MVP and start making revenue and&#x2F;or grow your user base while you figure things out.
评论 #18397286 未加载
评论 #18397116 未加载
评论 #18397032 未加载
评论 #18396921 未加载
评论 #18397430 未加载
评论 #18397631 未加载
评论 #18398874 未加载
评论 #18398821 未加载
评论 #18400791 未加载
评论 #18396889 未加载
评论 #18396863 未加载
orta超过 6 年前
As someone who knows a few of the folks involved in this foundation, I think this is a real net positive for everyone who builds GraphQL APIs and is involved in improving the ecosystem.
xrd超过 6 年前
I remember when I was at RealNetworks a long time ago and Microsoft and Real were competing over the future of multimedia languages (SMIL vs HTML+Time). I was on some of the standardization committees and remember being surprised when some of my colleagues suggested that standardization was used by companies like MS to slow down the innovation process (and catch up to faster starts like RealNetworks had made). I wonder how often open source foundations serve the same purpose, or if these are truly embraced by companies like Facebook? Is there a reason internally Facebook would have fought something like this? Is it all roses?
评论 #18395905 未加载
评论 #18395737 未加载
评论 #18395248 未加载
评论 #18395246 未加载
评论 #18395306 未加载
mohsen1超过 6 年前
Both Swagger (Open API Spec) and GraphQL are now part of the Linux Foundation! That&#x27;s cool!
jondubois超过 6 年前
I&#x27;m not a big fan of GraphQL. Its main benefit is for serverless which I am also not a fan of. It shifts all the control to the client and makes the server generic which actually takes away flexibility overall.
LeicaLatte超过 6 年前
Are there good alternatives to Apollo at all?
评论 #18398331 未加载
评论 #18399686 未加载
评论 #18442642 未加载
评论 #18398183 未加载
tw1010超过 6 年前
Oh great, an ad that covers the entire page on mobile. Guess I&#x27;m not reading this article then.
评论 #18395153 未加载
评论 #18398537 未加载
评论 #18395194 未加载
评论 #18395190 未加载
nikhilsimha超过 6 年前
About time.
beders超过 6 年前
N+1
评论 #18396412 未加载
degyves超过 6 年前
Great. Another solution for an already-solved, already-standardized query API language (SPARQL).
评论 #18395846 未加载
评论 #18396422 未加载
评论 #18395670 未加载
评论 #18395717 未加载
评论 #18395651 未加载
评论 #18395723 未加载