TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

AI Playbook

249 点作者 febin超过 6 年前

8 条评论

stanfordkid超过 6 年前
It&#x27;s really quite interesting how A16z is playing this. I&#x27;ve been following the types of content that they release -- and I think their vision is that the a16z brand can almost function as a consultancy with (not only) direct channels to the enterprise, but also deep technical knowledge of their problems. In the old world consultancies most of the money went to the partners -- but top engineers didn&#x27;t get to rake in the profits.<p>In the modern world, top engineers can band together, raise VC funding, build some stupid app and get acqui-hired for 5-10x the salary. Huge discrepancies in comp.<p>The natural progression is that VC funds build channels and in-house expertise on technical problems in enterprise. Top engineers raise funding and are guided by partners towards solving these problems.<p>The new model is not that enterprises pay consultancies to solve problems, but instead, they form long standing trust based relationships with VC&#x27;s who then fund companies that solve their problems (and profit when the companies profit). A big part of making this differentiation happen is releasing content that educates leaders and implementers within such enterprises.
评论 #18472623 未加载
评论 #18471887 未加载
评论 #18470926 未加载
评论 #18472338 未加载
评论 #18472454 未加载
lvh超过 6 年前
&gt; We&#x27;ve met with hundreds of Fortune 500 &#x2F; Global 2000 companies, startups, and government policy makers asking: &quot;How do I get started with artificial intelligence?&quot; and &quot;What can I do with AI in my own product or company?&quot;<p>You&#x27;re definitely never in a concerning part of a hype cycle when you have a technology in search of a problem. How many of these organizations just needed someone who could write a SQL query?
评论 #18471337 未加载
tedmiston超过 6 年前
It looks like this was launched in May 2017. There&#x27;s more context in the post below:<p>&gt; We’ve met with hundreds of Fortune 500&#x2F; Global 2000 companies, startups, and government agencies asking: “How do I get started with artificial intelligence?” and “What can I do with AI in my own product or company?”<p>&gt; While there are many excellent tutorials out there that show how to use TensorFlow or the beautiful math behind neural network training, we couldn’t find a broad overview — a “Chapter 0”, if you will — for product managers, line of business leaders, strategists, policymakers, non-AI developers to read first before moving on to more technical materials. So building on our popular primer on artificial intelligence, today we’ve launched a microsite to help newcomers — both non-technical and technical — begin exploring what’s possible with AI. The site is designed as a resource for anyone asking the two questions above, complete with examples and sample code to help get started; no computer science degree required! Ultimately, it’s aimed at people who aren’t only studying AI in universities or labs and just want to get their hands and heads around it as they explore options for their own companies.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;a16z.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;05&#x2F;12&#x2F;ai-playbook&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;a16z.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;05&#x2F;12&#x2F;ai-playbook&#x2F;</a>
saurabh20n超过 6 年前
It would be useful to have a section: &quot;What AI cannot do&quot; or to be pedantic: &quot;What the current AI techniques cannot do.&quot;
sonnyblarney超过 6 年前
I appreciate this article; I&#x27;m impressed when intelligent people can take complex things and explain them in laymen&#x27;s terms.<p>I buy the idea that AI will be like RDBMS.<p>Except ...<p>RDMBS is tangible, straight forward. Easily applicable.<p>AI is indirect, soft.<p>So while I agree AI will find it&#x27;s way into most things - and - will be a critical feature of some things (i.e. it will enable self driving cars) ... I still think it&#x27;s over hyped.<p>It&#x27;s a new and interesting field that is just too vague and &#x27;non-parameterizeable&#x27; to provide value in so many ways.<p>Remember &#x27;Big Data&#x27; - it was mostly an optimization. Most businesses simply don&#x27;t depend on data in such quantities, and when they can make use of it, it&#x27;s often just a tweak to their business, not a deep strategic insight.<p>If we see an explosion in GPU type computing, wherein AI experiments are able to grow maximally, perhaps we can dream a little bigger ...<p>But in the meantime &#x27;there be a lot of hype&#x27; around this subject.<p>Kudos for the article, though.
评论 #18476307 未加载
sirthemano超过 6 年前
I wonder if they made this because they&#x27;re struggling to get enough high quality AI startups coming their way. A decade ago you wouldn&#x27;t really see VCs do this kind of stuff.
whyte_mackay超过 6 年前
Interesting that I always used Andreessen&#x27;s: Why software is eating the world? [1] as a temper to AI hype. You can replace &quot;blockchain&quot; with &quot;distributed database&quot; or &quot;AI&quot; with &quot;software&quot; and look at the result for if the use of AI or blockchain was just buzzword lingo or actually semantically relevant.<p>But now they have a chapter: &quot;Giving Your Software AI Superpowers&quot;, which breaks this technique hard.<p>AI&#x27;s history, to me, starts with Operational Research:<p>&gt; Employing techniques from other mathematical sciences, such as mathematical modeling, statistical analysis, and mathematical optimization, operations research arrives at optimal or near-optimal solutions to complex decision-making problems. Because of its emphasis on human-technology interaction and because of its focus on practical applications, operations research has overlap with other disciplines, notably industrial engineering and operations management, and draws on psychology and organization science. Operations research is often concerned with determining the maximum (of profit, performance, or yield) or minimum (of loss, risk, or cost) of some real-world objective. Originating in military efforts before World War II, its techniques have grown to concern problems in a variety of industries.<p>Later authorities were just (in part) rebranding OR for Darpa&#x2F;Iarpa grant money.<p>I like this executive summary though: It is good reading for managers and CEO&#x27;s who may not be familiar with AI and its possibilities. For practitioners it is mostly fluff though and any intro course will give a better overview. A real playbook has yet to be written.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;SB10001424053111903480904576512250915629460" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;SB10001424053111903480904576512...</a>
dmos62超过 6 年前
This seems to be, to quote, &quot;a pre-tutorial -- a Chapter 0&quot;. I was expecting an actual playbook, as in strategies and approaches to different challenges, a list of things ML and AI can do well at this time. For me, that would be a very interesting resource.
评论 #18471907 未加载