TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Errors of TeX (1978-2014) [pdf]

22 点作者 nazri1超过 6 年前

6 条评论

svat超过 6 年前
Note that this is the “raw” log — to put it in context and make sense of the abbreviations, you need to read the <i>actual</i> paper named <i>The Errors of TeX</i> (1989, also reprinted in the book <i>Literate Programming</i>). The paper has DOI 10.1002&#x2F;spe.4380190702 and Google search finds a copy here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;yurichev.com&#x2F;mirrors&#x2F;knuth1989.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;yurichev.com&#x2F;mirrors&#x2F;knuth1989.pdf</a><p>At minimum, the abbreviations are also given in <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tug.org&#x2F;TUGboat&#x2F;tb10-4&#x2F;tb26knut.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tug.org&#x2F;TUGboat&#x2F;tb10-4&#x2F;tb26knut.pdf</a> but the paper is much more. (Rehashing my comment from earlier: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=18177962" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=18177962</a>)<p>Incidentally, some archives of the old TeX source code are available online... it might be an interesting project to combine the two, but I&#x27;m not finding the time to do it. If anyone is interested in helping &#x2F; doing it, let me know. :-)
rudolfwinestock超过 6 年前
Here&#x27;s the entry for 14 March 1978:<p>&gt; Came in evening after sleeping most of day, to get computer at better time.<p>&gt; Some day we will have personal computers and will live more normally.
评论 #18589128 未加载
ktpsns超过 6 年前
In case you didn&#x27;t know, the source code of TeX itself is Pascal and published as a 500 pages literate programming tool which clearly is rendered with TeX, available at <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;texdoc.net&#x2F;texmf-dist&#x2F;doc&#x2F;generic&#x2F;knuth&#x2F;tex&#x2F;tex.pdf#625" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;texdoc.net&#x2F;texmf-dist&#x2F;doc&#x2F;generic&#x2F;knuth&#x2F;tex&#x2F;tex.pdf#6...</a><p>If this was machine readable, then TeX could compile TeX ;-)
benj111超过 6 年前
Why is this dated 1989, it starts in the 70s and through to this century.<p>Even as Svat says, you need a 1989 paper to make sense of it.
chj超过 6 年前
Reads like well written git commit messages.
评论 #18589601 未加载
zoomablemind超过 6 年前
It&#x27;s about TeX (not Tex). The post title should be corrected.<p>It&#x27;s a widely accepted spelling and is unambiguous in describing the topic.