TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Udacity lays off 125 people in global strategy shift

182 点作者 acdanger超过 6 年前

13 条评论

muhneesh超过 6 年前
I&#x27;ve completed 10 online learning courses and probably spend 20 hrs&#x2F;week learning online.<p>Udacity Likes: I loved Udacity&#x27;s production quality &amp; instructors. I think they are generally awesome in the balance of teaching concept and practical knowledge. They also don&#x27;t shy away from more complicated topics like autonomous vehicles, InfoSec, AI &#x2F; ML, etc., which is a unique asset.<p>Udacity Dislikes: They are placing too large of a bet on the nanodegree concept. There isn&#x27;t a clear ROI for students - and it&#x27;s fairly clear that most companies don&#x27;t really give a hoot about online certifications.<p>Their classes are too expensive. Both Udacity and Udemy have great Web Dev classes. Udemy&#x27;s was $10 for 19 hours of content + responses to any questions I had within hours, and gave me everything I wanted + more. Unfortunately, I had to sift through the Bootcamp and Nanodegree madness on Udacity.<p>They are unaccredited. My company (maybe most companies?) only subsidizes classes that are accredited. I have a $10,000 annual credit and I use it all on university classes. I would definitely consider Udacity nanowhatevers if I could use my credit on them.
评论 #18601298 未加载
评论 #18599965 未加载
评论 #18600148 未加载
评论 #18599022 未加载
评论 #18599343 未加载
评论 #18600662 未加载
评论 #18605797 未加载
评论 #18599838 未加载
评论 #18601422 未加载
eksemplar超过 6 年前
I truly don’t get how sites like udacity are able to sell thousands of amateurish introductions to various trends, when you can literally follow CS50 in all its incantations for free on edX.org.<p>Sure it won’t give you a video guide of X popular framework intro-documentation pages, but it will actually teach you CS for free, and I’d argue, that if you can complete CS50x and CS50x Web, then you’ll never need a site like udacity.<p>I guess FOMO sells though.
评论 #18596994 未加载
评论 #18597167 未加载
评论 #18597228 未加载
评论 #18597680 未加载
评论 #18598764 未加载
评论 #18599548 未加载
评论 #18597218 未加载
评论 #18599988 未加载
评论 #18600827 未加载
cheriot超过 6 年前
&gt; We will increase our investments in growth areas like enterprise and career development<p>I&#x27;m surprised the shift has taken this long. Employers will spend massively more on employee development than employees will.<p>Employer: $2,000 for a 5 day class? No problem.<p>Employee out of pocket: $150 for 6 weeks? I wonder if I can just read some tutorials.
评论 #18597158 未加载
评论 #18605639 未加载
StudentStuff超过 6 年前
Does getting a nanodegree from Udacity significantly improve ones hirability? For $600, it looks like one gets a shot at a nanodegree that has numerous soft deadlines, but with fixed, inflexible deadlines potentially piling up at the end of the course.<p>In my experience, having a mostly self paced class with no hard deadlines, then a stack of hard deadlines for projects at the very end results in stressed out students and a ton of poorly done work. Choose a model and stick to it, either its self paced with no defined end date, in which case people will learn at their own pace, or its a classic fixed format course, with a list of due dates published prior to the class even starting.<p>Edit: Additionally, the refund window seems much shorter than one sees at traditional colleges and there is still no accreditation for the nanodegrees Udacity lists. At accredited institutions, these types of workforce retraining programs have a bit more heft, and set you up to go straight into a decently paid job. It appears Udacity hasn&#x27;t solved this problem.
评论 #18597672 未加载
评论 #18596760 未加载
评论 #18597777 未加载
jammygit超过 6 年前
Udacity has been much better than my actual university for almost every topic I&#x27;ve went to them for. I&#x27;m sad to hear they&#x27;re going through this.<p>On the topic, how does their security nanodegree look? It starts early 2019 and I&#x27;ve been seriously considering it.
评论 #18597044 未加载
TheMagicHorsey超过 6 年前
I paid for their self driving car class, very early. It was a mistake to do that.<p>Not because the class material or teaching was bad. On the contrary it was very good.<p>Rather because they did not let me access the materials after the class was over. They would not let me postpone completion of the class based on my schedule.<p>It was very much like a real course. I thought it would be more like a course that I could complete on my own schedule if I missed their schedule. I didn&#x27;t want their certificate. I just wanted to learn the material.<p>After paying over $600 for the course, it really rubbed me the wrong way that they shut me out of the course lectures and materials. It would not have cost them anything to allow me to learn at my own pace. But they decided to go that way.<p>One of the points that was really annoying and borderline fraudulent is that their free courses don&#x27;t operate like that. Those materials are available to you all the time. It&#x27;s just the courses you pay for where your experience is worse. Go figure.<p>Anyway, $600 was a cheap way to learn the lesson not to buy a course from them again.<p>I really think there&#x27;s a place for a good company to sell courses on emerging technology, and to charge premium prices. They just have to understand that most people need to be able to tackle the material in a self-paced manner. Some of us have jobs and families.
znpy超过 6 年前
Udacity essentially failed in reaching its base goal: becoming an university capable of issuing bachelors degrees, via the mooc teaching method.<p>No wonder it now needs &quot;restructuring&quot;.
评论 #18597077 未加载
edshiro超过 6 年前
This seems like a necessary reset, especially given their very high valuation. I personally enjoyed most of Udacity&#x27;s Self-Driving Car Engineer Nanodegree. The content was great and at the time I had a very supportive mentor (gutted they got rid of this feature). Moreover, they have managed to build a large community of current students and alumni who keep in touch even after the nanodegree is over.<p>I would suggest they reduce the number of courses they offer and improve quality. I tend to see them as a more &quot;premium&quot; MOOC but I do agree that quality of content is variable depending on course.<p>Another area they should naturally look at is training for employees in corporations. I really hope Sebastian Thrun can turn things around.
评论 #18598630 未加载
评论 #18597734 未加载
asien超过 6 年前
Absolutely not surprise.<p>Unicorns like Udacity have extremely high valuation but are barely making any money.<p>Most of their spendings goes into Marketing and not actual R&amp;D for education.
评论 #18597475 未加载
评论 #18597697 未加载
notgettingfined超过 6 年前
Hopefully they make their classes focused more on teaching useful information than trying to make students feel good about completing projects that have the challenging portions already completed. I am going through the self-driving driving car nano degree and I do not see how this could do much to convince an employer you know anything
评论 #18634417 未加载
wpdev_63超过 6 年前
Not surprised. I took one of their courses and found it to be incredibly shallow in comparison to actual college courses and edx. It&#x27;s closer to those baby youtube tutorial video than anything that resembles a course.<p>Anyone notice the google trademark has been remove from their android course?
评论 #18599252 未加载
criddell超过 6 年前
What&#x27;s the difference between Udacity and Udemy? Are they the same company?<p>Also, I&#x27;d love to hear about your favorite online courses. I took Andrew Ng&#x27;s Machine Learning and Dan Boneh&#x27;s Cryptography (both on Coursera) and they were excellent.
diminish超过 6 年前
Udacity&#x27;s clean, curated, well designed approach lost to market based diverse mooc approach by others.