TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Did Agile definitely kill Waterfall?

9 点作者 sandrobfc超过 6 年前

2 条评论

mimixco超过 6 年前
Big companies with lots to lose will always use a waterfall process. Facebook can move fast and break things because there's little risk to them, but fintech, legal, military, and medical software will always require peer review and a waterfall process. When I was a mainframe programmer at IBM, it was the waterfall process that protected customers from untested code and, as a result, you don't hear much about giant hacks or thefts in things like bank accounts, Social Security checks, or industrial manufacturing. That's because the suppliers of those programs don't want to move fast and break things. They want to move slowly and be sure that software works, to the best of their ability, before shipping.
评论 #18610719 未加载
gregjor超过 6 年前
No. In fact a lot of waterfall projects just get called agile.
评论 #18611031 未加载