TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Microsoft releases F# under Apache 2.0 license

217 点作者 ataranto超过 14 年前

10 条评论

gphil超过 14 年前
This is a good move. With Java under Oracle's control, Microsoft has a lot to gain by embracing open source licensing.
评论 #1871746 未加载
评论 #1872276 未加载
评论 #1872568 未加载
equark超过 14 年前
It's interesting how the F# team is pushing F# to be the language for data-rich programming. Their Type Provider concept looks promising, but some of their demos still are comically difficult coming from a R/Matlab/Python style of data-rich programming. Of course coming from C#/Java it all looks amazing.<p>But I don't quite see how F# replaces R or Matlab, even with library support. Performance alone seems dubious value proposition, since packages like Jacket for Matlab make most computations extremely fast.<p>Anybody have experience where demand for strongly typed language is really needed for data analysis tasks?
评论 #1873396 未加载
评论 #1872189 未加载
ericflo超过 14 年前
"After some discussion, we’ve decided to do this via a “code drop” model..."<p>They lost me here.
评论 #1871845 未加载
mfukar超过 14 年前
First IronPython &#38; IronRuby (<a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1833772" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1833772</a> ) and now this. I have to say, Microsoft is (or seems to be, depending on your philosophical disposition) increasingly embracing FOSS, and that's a very good move not only for them, but also the community.
评论 #1872445 未加载
8ren超过 14 年前
Java is Oracle stack, C# is MS stack, objective-C is Apple stack.<p>Is there an opportunity for an open language with similar VM ease-of-use/performance tradeoffs - or is hardware now fast enough for the ease/speed of dynamic languages to fill that gap (Python, Ruby, Javascript, ...)?
评论 #1871871 未加载
评论 #1872447 未加载
评论 #1872054 未加载
scalyweb超过 14 年前
Great News! Mono here we come...
评论 #1871794 未加载
评论 #1872556 未加载
评论 #1871847 未加载
评论 #1871811 未加载
MichaelGG超过 14 年前
Does it mean anything in particular that they chose the Apache 2.0 license? Their previously public plans were to use MS-Pl.
评论 #1871821 未加载
gaustin超过 14 年前
I wonder what it would take to remove the dependency on the .NET runtime. Could anyone with relevant experience and knowledge comment?
评论 #1874077 未加载
keyle超过 14 年前
Are we getting any closer of developing .NET / WPF apps on Mac? (Wishful thinking, shameless cry)
评论 #1872044 未加载
评论 #1872007 未加载
评论 #1873254 未加载
评论 #1872008 未加载
rbanffy超过 14 年前
That makes me believe there is no protection against contributor patents in the Apache 2.0 license...<p>At least they won't sue you if you use it under Windows.
评论 #1871765 未加载
评论 #1872298 未加载