“More than a year and a half later, Amtrak, a private company <i>whose stock is primarily owned by the federal government and which depends on congressional funding to operate</i>, has yet to repeat its analysis for the network as a whole.”<p>So, _not_ a private company.<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/2015/03/09/dd125130-c691-11e4-aa1a-86135599fb0f_story.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/2015/03/0...</a><p>(From 2015 – Supreme Court says Amtrak is more like a public entity than a private firm)<p>""
All the justices agreed to overturn the lower-court ruling in which the Association of American Railroads had prevailed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit: that Amtrak was a strictly private entity and as such Congress was wrong in 2008 to set up a system that allowed it to issue regulations.<p>The lower court had based the decision on Congress’s command that Amtrak “is not a department, agency or instrumentality of the United States Government.”<p>But Justice Anthony M. Kennedy said saying so does not necessarily make it so.<p>The government puts all sorts of demands on Amtrak — maintaining service between Louisiana and Florida, for instance, or offering reduced fares for elderly or disabled passengers — not to mention giving it subsidies of about $1 billion a year, Kennedy said.<p>“Amtrak was created by the Government, is controlled by the Government, and operates for the Government’s benefit,” Kennedy wrote. Thus, in working with the Federal Railroad Administration to issue the “metrics and standards” for performance, “Amtrak acted as a governmental entity for purposes of the Constitution’s separation of powers provisions.”
""<p>In Ireland we call entities like this <i>semi-state</i> companies: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-sponsored_bodies_of_the_Republic_of_Ireland" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-sponsored_bodies_of_the_...</a>