TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Swedish startup Rdot is trying to take on E Ink

72 点作者 danielam超过 6 年前

10 条评论

eximius超过 6 年前
I was just today looking at E-inks new &#x27;JustWrite&#x27; technology where the screen pixels are activated by a stylus instead of the backing, so writing feels instant (and might be just about instant too). If this tech also has that possibility, then good on them. Edit: though I&#x27;m not aware of a product which incorporates it yet, which is a shame. Maybe I&#x27;m wrong - research on mobile is hard.<p>What I&#x27;d love is a notebook of the stuff that I could write on and save and swap the contents with an open protocol&#x2F;app.<p>I&#x27;d also probably love hacking on the stuff. Make a &#x27;spellbook&#x27; for one of my D&amp;D characters where the contents change &#x27;magically&#x27;. :)
评论 #18773154 未加载
评论 #18781237 未加载
ipsum2超过 6 年前
Good. E-ink displays are expensive and have a monopoly on low-energy persistent displays.<p>However, Rdot doesn&#x27;t have nearly the same resolution as E-ink at this time, it seems: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rdotdisplays.com&#x2F;technology" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rdotdisplays.com&#x2F;technology</a>
评论 #18767598 未加载
评论 #18767530 未加载
评论 #18767725 未加载
int_19h超过 6 年前
&quot;Typically, the energy required for a full switch on an E Ink display is about 4mJ&#x2F;cm2. The corresponding number for the Rdot display is about 1mJ&#x2F;cm2 with the addition of 0,25mJ&#x2F;cm2 every 15 minutes. LCD continuously consumes about 6µW&#x2F;cm2.&quot;<p>This is some interesting numbers. So, for a 1 cm^2 screen, LCD consumes 6mJ for every 1000 seconds - i.e. just over 15 minutes. But to redraw the screen on eInk takes 4mJ. So if you do something that would cause the screen to fully redraw more than twice every 15 minutes, then eInk actually consumes more power? But wouldn&#x27;t that generally be the case while reading?
评论 #18768737 未加载
评论 #18767965 未加载
zwayhowder超过 6 年前
Considering I&#x27;m still waiting for my Indigogo backed 13.3&quot; Good E-Reader from June 2016 I won&#x27;t be holding my breath for this.
评论 #18767773 未加载
jonbaer超过 6 年前
Interview w&#x2F; the CEO @ <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=hS5_D0bxLWI" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=hS5_D0bxLWI</a> ... can someone explain he mentions the display is semi stable + lasts &quot;one hour&quot; does it need to refresh 24x @ some point to hold an all day display?
roel_v超过 6 年前
E-ink and similar tech seems to have tapered off the last couple of years, the only thing (as far as I know) that is doing anything new is the reMarkable. I was just about to pull the trigger on ordering one - anyone have experience with it? Is it really as paper-like as they claim?
评论 #18769349 未加载
评论 #18768960 未加载
plorntus超过 6 年前
I don&#x27;t fully understand from reading the article why this is better than EInk. Seems it just uses 1&#x2F;4 of the energy but other than that is there more benefits to it?
评论 #18767355 未加载
评论 #18767265 未加载
评论 #18767309 未加载
评论 #18767534 未加载
评论 #18767485 未加载
pasta超过 6 年前
I love to have a reflective screen in my phone and as monitor.<p>For those devices energy consumption is just low priority.<p>Color and refresh-rate is where most reflective screens fail. So if you take on E ink I think that&#x27;s where you should shine.
gumby超过 6 年前
I wonder how fast they change? The time to rewrite the screen is a major bummer for me when compared to flipping pages with dead-tree paper
评论 #18768522 未加载
评论 #18767703 未加载
ATsch超过 6 年前
How is this different from the Sharp Memory LCDs?
评论 #18767410 未加载