TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: What do you think about the Secalot hardware token?

2 点作者 pablo1超过 6 年前
Comparing open source security tokens&#x2F;OTP generators&#x2F;UFA tokens&#x2F;PGP Smartcards, it seems the product from secalot has the most features for a similar price as the alternatives. It also has open source software and hardware.<p>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.secalot.com&#x2F;<p>Has anybody tried it and can compare it to more popular alternatives like the yubikey or the nitrokey?<p>How would you rate this from a security aspect?

1 comment

jans23超过 6 年前
From the security point of view the most obvious difference to me is that Nitrokey contains a secure element while Secalot doesn&#x27;t. (Secalot contains a microprocessor with cryptographic acceleration but don&#x27;t confuse this with a secure element.) Secure elements are secure key stores which protect against extraction of cryptographic keys by malware and by physical attackers.<p>Also Secalot seems to be a small project while Nitrokey is a (small) company, which might influence quality of security and maintenance too.<p>Disclaimer: I&#x27;m with Nitrokey UG.
评论 #18891759 未加载