This is the most intellectually dishonest thing I've read in a while. Claims to have a bunch of data, then abandons the data as soon as its analysis time. It's pretty obvious the data collected didn't correlate with the author's preconceived idea of what he wanted to find. The whole article is a bunch of mental gymnastics trying to codify an opinion with so-called data points, but only the ones that concur with the hypothesis. Total garbage, whoever wrote this should be ashamed of themselves. If real science was carried out this way, we'd never have invented a microprocessor.