TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Advocacy groups are pushing the FTC to break up Facebook

79 点作者 wil_I_am_27超过 6 年前

7 条评论

porpoisely超过 6 年前
&quot;Advocacy groups&quot; hired and funded by whom? There are lots of &quot;advocacy groups&quot; demanding a lot of things. It would be interesting to find out why theverge and other news companies selectively choose which &quot;advocacy groups&quot; to promote.<p>Also, what about microsoft, netflix, amazon, twitter and most importantly google? Also, what about humongous international banks? Or the chemicals&#x2F;agribusiness where 2 or 3 companies dominate the world&#x27;s market. What about the media? Where a handle of megacorporations own so much of the market?
评论 #18992964 未加载
root_axis超过 6 年前
Break it up into what? All the problems of Facebook are inherent to Facebook as a product, &quot;breaking up&quot; Facebook doesn&#x27;t really fix anything.
评论 #18994323 未加载
评论 #18992481 未加载
评论 #18995156 未加载
评论 #18992398 未加载
评论 #18992983 未加载
wudangmonk超过 6 年前
Are there any historical examples of this where the company in question was not in charge or national resources or infrastructure that was paid by a government?. All the bell, oil, railroad examples have this in common.<p>Short of the government making these companies the only government approved ones in their respective fields I do not see how breaking them up would be something that can be done. Even then the monopoly would only exist because yet again the government created it.
评论 #18993020 未加载
ashton314超过 6 年前
Are there any analogous corporate breakups in history? Any tech companies that have been broken up as these people are suggesting?
评论 #18991613 未加载
nkingsy超过 6 年前
It seems to me that US trust busting in the past was:<p>1. Seen as radical at the time, and odious to all private industry. 2. Able to leave shareholder value somewhat intact because they were simply splitting physical assets.<p>While I think 2 might be addressed by eg forcing Instagram&#x2F;YouTube&#x2F;etc to spin off, 1 would require the election of radicals to high office. Our political system has built in so many safeguards over the years to keep true radicals out of office that I just can&#x27;t see it happening. Trump promised many things, but disruption of business was not one of them.<p>edit: What I see as more likely is regulations that preserve shareholder value and enshrine these companies as utilities, erecting barriers to entry so high that they become permanent monopolies, while (hopefully) slowly reigning in the wild profits.<p>edit 2: Facebook&#x27;s current share price basically values it as a utility already, and given their slowing growth they might even lobby for such regulation themselves to staunch the bleeding.
评论 #18992802 未加载
评论 #18993305 未加载
JumpCrisscross超过 6 年前
What’s the best one for a New Yorker to get involved with?
basic1超过 6 年前
Break up Google while you&#x27;re at it.
评论 #18992307 未加载