Amidst Global Warming Hysteria, Nasa Expects Global Cooling

Is this legitimate? I can&#x27;t tell anymore when I read articles about climate change, because both sides seem to mix in some lies or half-truths and misrepresent what the situation really is.<p>I&#x27;ve read parts of the IPCC 2014 report and they seem to be contrary to what the article is about. On the other hand, some of the things I read in the report did make me question the validity of the conclusions, particularly the parts about what their climate change models can predict. (According to the report it&#x27;s not much because of our inability to model clouds properly.)<p>I see what points the article is making, but it seems more like politics to me than trying to inform me of the truth.

The key sentence from NASA: &quot;High above Earth’s surface, near the edge of space, our atmosphere is losing heat energy.&quot; In other words, less heat is leaking up from surface level to the edge of space.<p>The heat is staying down here instead.

To be honest, this always seemed more likely.<p>Global cooling was the dominant theory from the time investigation of greenhouse gases began in the late 19th century up until the late 1970’s.<p>While the Venus-like future of Earth is entirely possible, there seems to be far more evidence of planets with damaged atmospheres becoming too cold &#x2F; losing entropy.