TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

New California bill could help curb 'neighbor spoofing' spam and scam robocalls

2 点作者 my_first_acct超过 6 年前

3 条评论

my_first_acct超过 6 年前
From the article:<p>&gt; The new bill, SB 208, was introduced by Senator Ben Hueso (D.-San Diego) earlier this week. It effectively sets a deadline of July 1, 2020 as the date by which phone companies must &quot;take the steps necessary to stop these illegal scams.&quot;<p>&gt; ...<p>&gt; The FCC had previously suggested phone companies utilize a system called the Secure Telephony Identity Revisited and Secure Handling of Asserted information using toKENs (STIR&#x2F;SHAKEN), which helps law enforcement identify numbers attached to robocall efforts. However, no deadline has yet been legally set for these companies to take any official action.<p>Can a telephony expert comment on whether the California law is technically and&#x2F;or economically feasible?
harper59超过 6 年前
I really hope that the government will find a complete way to stop the usage of number spoofing for personal&#x2F;business use. This technology become a popular (and easy) technique for criminals. I read thousands of reports filed at sites like <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;whycall.me" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;whycall.me</a> about this.
masonic超过 6 年前
I don&#x27;t know how a state can limit Caller-ID fakery via VOIP on its own.<p>VOIP connections in or to the US should have to provide a legitimate Caller-ID (actual origin # or corresponding switchboard accepting inbound calls) or blocked number, but never a false number.