TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Next Wave of ‘Unicorn’ Startups

111 点作者 rm2889超过 6 年前

15 条评论

drdaeman超过 6 年前
I didn&#x27;t knew the meaning of &quot;unicorn&quot; when applied to companies. Maybe I&#x27;m the only person who still hadn&#x27;t, but if there are others - to save them a search query:<p>&quot;A unicorn is a privately held startup company valued at over $1 billion.&quot; - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Unicorn_(finance)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Unicorn_(finance)</a>
评论 #19148391 未加载
评论 #19155450 未加载
评论 #19148694 未加载
aresant超过 6 年前
&quot;Wow, 11 of these 50 were funded by Y Combinator:&quot; - Paul Graham via Twitter - worth a read of that thread in which PG also notes that he has had nothing to do w&#x2F;class selection since 2014:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;paulg&#x2F;status&#x2F;1095075300852019201" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;paulg&#x2F;status&#x2F;1095075300852019201</a>
评论 #19147934 未加载
评论 #19146951 未加载
jhallenworld超过 6 年前
The online pharmacy (Alto Pharmacy) and online doctor (KRY) are the ones that sound like they could be unicorns, but they are going against entrenched interests.<p>Uber took on cab drivers and won. Doctors and pharmacists have much stronger quasi-unions (the AMA and AphA).
评论 #19151178 未加载
tomphoolery超过 6 年前
Earnin is a scam that disproportionately targets young poor black&#x2F;latino people. It&#x27;s JG Wentworth in an app. Doesn&#x27;t count as a unicorn because it&#x27;s not innovative at all.
评论 #19147584 未加载
评论 #19146978 未加载
评论 #19147333 未加载
评论 #19147133 未加载
评论 #19147017 未加载
评论 #19149394 未加载
basseq超过 6 年前
Demographics:<p>21 in California (16 in San Fran)<p>11 in APAC<p>9 on the East Coast (including MapBox)<p>3 in Europe<p>3 in S. America<p>3 in &quot;other US&quot;
评论 #19149131 未加载
rrdharan超过 6 年前
Seems like the linked article is more an analysis &#x2F; summary and doesn&#x27;t actually have the list, which is in <i>this</i> linked article:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;02&#x2F;10&#x2F;technology&#x2F;these-50-start-ups-may-be-the-next-unicorns.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;02&#x2F;10&#x2F;technology&#x2F;these-50-start...</a><p>Did they rejigger things since the submission?
ackbar03超过 6 年前
They site a lot of stuff from cbinsights. I don&#x27;t know about others but I find cbinsights analysis a bit sloppy sometimes. They kept crowing about the potentials blockchain and how it was the future all through the crash as though it wasn&#x27;t even taking place. They also had this piece about we work which painted them in glowing colors right in the aftermath of the additional funding from softbank not coming through, giving fluffy reasons why they think their still going to continue to upend the industry. Plus all their emails end with &quot;I love you&quot; which is getting old and annoying. Not intentionally smashing them but just making the point that aside from the numeric data they collect on startups which is pretty cool, I&#x27;m skeptical about using their analysis pieces as a proper source
freyir超过 6 年前
It looks like the list and the commentary are on separate pages:<p>List: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;02&#x2F;10&#x2F;technology&#x2F;these-50-start-ups-may-be-the-next-unicorns.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;02&#x2F;10&#x2F;technology&#x2F;these-50-start...</a><p>Commentary: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;02&#x2F;10&#x2F;technology&#x2F;new-wave-unicorn-start-ups.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;02&#x2F;10&#x2F;technology&#x2F;new-wave-unico...</a>
dr_超过 6 年前
They should describe how they came up with this list. For example, Alto pharmacy, which appears to primarily operate in California, is on the list. They raised $50 million last December. Capsule pharmacy, which essentially does the same thing, primarily operates out of NYC. They also raised $50 million a few months earlier, in August 2018, but are not on this list. Wonder why?
评论 #19149399 未加载
chadmhorner超过 6 年前
Honestly haven&#x27;t heard of any of those potential unicorns (except Zola), but I guess that is sort of the point!
yowlingcat超过 6 年前
This list looks positively anemic. How is this anything but a business insider esque PR puff piece?
anongraddebt超过 6 年前
I&#x27;m not sure how up to date the wiki unicorn list is, but for those interested:<p>China (131) U.S. (85) India (20)<p>----<p>Some of those listed will likely fall-off in the near future (e.g. Ofo).
DeonPenny超过 6 年前
Mapbox, Check, Marqeta, and Segment are basically already unicorns. Wouldn&#x27;t be surprised to see them IPO in the next 3 years.
huntermeyer超过 6 年前
No Paywall: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;outline.com&#x2F;qp6P8w" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;outline.com&#x2F;qp6P8w</a>
dmode超过 6 年前
Despite predictions to the contrary, San Francisco (and Bay Area) continues to kill it when it comes to unicorn production
评论 #19147050 未加载
评论 #19147738 未加载
评论 #19147014 未加载