TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Does this tiered SAAS pricing model offend you?

5 点作者 fido超过 14 年前
I'm about to launch a niche support app that will be sold on a per user basis. I've been thinking a lot about pricing today, since that is the only code remaining for my MVP. A lot of SAAS offerings charge based on user/agent tiers, and I'd love to know how people generally feel about this.<p>For example:<p>$50 - up to 3 users<p>$100 - up to 10 users<p>$200 - up to 25 users etc<p>I see a lot of companies doing this (Highrise, Chargify, etc). In the above example, the per user cost is all over the map. 1 user is $50/user...3 users is about $17/user... 4 users is $25/user...etc etc.<p>My gut tells me that the fairest route would be to simply charge per agent. I think it would also be ok to keep the first tier...so $50 for 3 users, then $X per additional user (where $x is less than $17).<p>Or... do companies prefer to pay on tiers so they can easily gauge their monthly expenses?<p>Does anybody have any thoughts? experiences?

4 条评论

cperciva超过 14 年前
My gut tells me that the price should be an analytic function of the number of users or resources used, with an everywhere-positive first derivative and an everywhere-nonpositive second derivative.<p>Then again, my service has pricing in picodollars, so I'm clearly crazy.
评论 #1922493 未加载
exline超过 14 年前
It depends on the the service. I use freshbooks, and their plans are roughly based on number of customers you have. I don't mind paying more the more customers I have, because it means I'm making more money. I don't mind spending money when I'm making money.<p>One thought is that the bigger your customer is, the more they can afford to pay for the service. You don't want to leave to much money on the table. Its pretty normal for people to undercharge for their services. Do you have any feel for if you are going to get more 1-3, 4-10, 11-25 users?<p>The things I don't like about tiered services, is that there is a big price jump when you move between tiers. Moving from 3 to 4 users in your example doubles the cost to the service. I'd make more gradual tiers rather than big jumps.
johnnytee超过 14 年前
I'm curious about this as well and was going to submit this question to HN. I'm debating between charging say per $5 per user or like you say a tiered approach:<p>$7 - 1<p>$12 - 5<p>$22 - 20<p>$40 - 20<p>$90 - 50<p>$150 - 100<p>On one hand a flat fee per users seems to be the simplest approach where as the tiered system implies a deal with more users.<p>I'm leaning towards the tiered method. Everyone loves to feel like they are getting a deal. I know I do and when I put myself in the buyers shoes I think this is what I'd like to see.
评论 #1922447 未加载
ameyamk超过 14 年前
I have similar question as well. I am building hosted telephony app, and the question is whether to charge base fee + telephony charges or bundle minutes into the plan. eg. $9 for basic plan + 5 cents a minute $15 for advanced plan + 3 cents a minute<p>OR<p>$15 with 500 Minutes $30 With 2000 Minutes etc.<p>what are general assumptions? What factors should I consider before making final decision?
评论 #1922432 未加载