TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Comparing the Network Performance of AWS, Azure and GCP [pdf]

73 点作者 thecybernerd超过 6 年前

5 条评论

Scaevolus超过 6 年前
I'm surprised they only tested latency and not throughput. Path differences should affect available bandwidth.
评论 #19203246 未加载
altmind超过 6 年前
It would be nice to have access to the raw performance data, all 30 days, all 1485 tests. This report is missing even the full list of regions tested. The rest of the data is heavily processed.<p>Surprised to see Azure having straightest routes and one of the lowest latencies - they always seemed to be an csp underdog to me.
评论 #19201975 未加载
salex89超过 6 年前
This slideshow looks kinda incomplete without the story. Is there a presentation video somewhere, or an article?
评论 #19201910 未加载
评论 #19203342 未加载
talawahdotnet超过 6 年前
Would be great to see global network performance comparisons with smaller providers like Digital Ocean and OVH. Everyone always knocks AWS on their bandwidth pricing, yet the pricing is in line with other major cloud providers and CDNs (GCP, Azure, Fastly). I would love to see what the actual trade-off looks like. Is there really that much of a difference in performance or reliability between them, or is it just a case of oligopoly pricing.<p>Would also be nice to see some stats for traffic <i>within</i> the same AZ as well. I generally see ping times between 0.1 and 0.2 ms within the same AZ on AWS, would be nice to know what that looks like on Azure and GCP.
infinitone超过 6 年前
One thing i&#x27;m still surprised about, there is still no site that allows you to easily compare pricing between all cloud providers (azure, aws, gcp, do)... seems like someone should of built one by now.
评论 #19202143 未加载