TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Tethered Uni-Rotor Network: Eternal Flight UAV

119 点作者 bennylope大约 6 年前

18 条评论

gene-h大约 6 年前
Another interesting idea in this domain is to use wind power rather than solar power. Wind gradients can be harnessed through dynamic soaring although this can be a bit limiting. One way we might get around this is by flying two airplanes connected by a long tether.[0][1] One airplane flying at a different altitude where the wind is significantly different can be used like a kite sail to pull the other airplane. Although it has been shown to be a pretty nasty control problem at least for a human[2].<p>[0]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nasa.gov&#x2F;feature&#x2F;flight-demonstration-of-novel-atmospheric-satellite-concept" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nasa.gov&#x2F;feature&#x2F;flight-demonstration-of-novel-a...</a> [1]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nasa.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;atoms&#x2F;files&#x2F;14-2015_phase_i_william_englom_virtual_flight_demostration_stratospheric_dual_aircraft_platform.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nasa.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;atoms&#x2F;files&#x2F;14-2015...</a> [2]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arc.aiaa.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.2514&#x2F;6.2018-1492" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arc.aiaa.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.2514&#x2F;6.2018-1492</a>
jselfridge大约 6 年前
I&#x27;m the originator of the TURN concept, and owner of the company. I can answer any questions you guys have about the vehicle.
评论 #19204792 未加载
评论 #19205468 未加载
评论 #19201820 未加载
评论 #19204553 未加载
评论 #19207150 未加载
评论 #19204180 未加载
upofadown大约 6 年前
Not sure I understand the images. The cables seem to be connected to the end of the wing units. A wing can&#x27;t normally generate force longitudinally. So how is the wing generating cable tension?<p>Added: OK, it is all generated by the centripetal force caused by the mass of the wing units. So fast spinning and lots of cable&#x2F;parasitic drag to get the wings reasonably level. Seems like a lot of wing area for a small payload. How is this better than just a wing large enough to support the payload with cables to distribute the load across the wing length?<p>Added2: This scheme still has the problem that the downwash from each wing will affect the other wings, just like in the helicopter case.
评论 #19199975 未加载
评论 #19199995 未加载
sargun大约 6 年前
This is very interesting. I&#x27;m a little confused though. The page talks at length about eternal flight, and how the turn system is supposed to enable them. Then, in the &quot;Smaller Scale Commercial Drone&quot; section (which I imagine is a smaller scale version of TURN), it states that the endurance is only 4.5-7.5 hours. What does scale do, which enables eternal flight? Is it just a matter of having more power on board?<p>In addition, what are these eternal flight numbers based on in terms of latitude, and season? In the video, he states that they were looking at internal combustion @ 30 days. What about the solar approach? Would 18 hours a day of light be enough? 12? 6?<p>Can anyone here call out whether or not this looks like a viable thing?
评论 #19201526 未加载
评论 #19200729 未加载
评论 #19200108 未加载
评论 #19200335 未加载
评论 #19200476 未加载
yathern大约 6 年前
Very exciting project! Love the idea, and can&#x27;t wait to see some proof of concepts eventually. It obviously has the potential to be revolutionary in the aerospace industry, though time will tell if it&#x27;s as effective as claimed of course.<p>They compare the TURN concept to satellites in the beginning, mentioning only positives by comparison - of which there are indeed many (cheaper, better comms). One thing I didn&#x27;t see mentioned was the failure mode between the two. A satellite that ceases to function will stay in orbit, until this orbit decays enough for it to burns in the upper atmosphere. If one of the rotors on this device fails, it will just come crashing down to earth.<p>And also, in typical neo-luddite fashion, I&#x27;m fearful for the surveillance applications of this device. Even if staying airborne isn&#x27;t eventually completely free (eternal flight) with this system, the ability to stay up for 9 hours at a time on a few Li-Ion cells opens up a world of possibilities, not all of which are great. If NOAA can afford to put a number of these out in the Atlantic to get better atmospheric readings, surely cities, states, city-states, and others can afford to put a number of these above their populace.<p>However, progress is inevitable, and the technology can&#x27;t always be blamed for it&#x27;s potentially negative applications. I think this is an amazing project - but it will require some self-control to not let this push us further into a surveillance state.
评论 #19200066 未加载
reaperducer大约 6 年前
Perhaps I just didn&#x27;t understand the web page, but this seems unnecessarily complicated.<p>The Department of Customs and Border Protection already operates a fleet of tethered airships. These seem to be a much simpler solution to &quot;eternal flight.&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Tethered_Aerostat_Radar_System" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Tethered_Aerostat_Radar_System</a>
评论 #19200358 未加载
评论 #19200131 未加载
评论 #19201060 未加载
评论 #19200234 未加载
sargun大约 6 年前
What&#x27;s the current longest endurance, COTS (commercial off the shelf) flight platform?
评论 #19200569 未加载
goda90大约 6 年前
I wonder if the development of thinner, flexible solar panels and batteries would make a lighter than air UAV a better choice for eternal flight. That way it only needs to power rotors for positioning instead of maintaining flight.
评论 #19201677 未加载
crowbahr大约 6 年前
I have to wonder what the maximum translational velocity would be for these hovering platforms. How well could they deal with high winds? Gusts? How quickly could they change their position?<p>To make a comms network you&#x27;d need them relatively evenly spaced out to maintain coverage over a wide area. You&#x27;d also need them to have beefy and power hungry broadcast&#x2F;receiver systems. How well can they scale with the solar energy?<p>Overall a very cool idea though!
评论 #19200141 未加载
gpm大约 6 年前
This seems like a really cool idea. What I can&#x27;t figure out is the bootstrap process. How do you launch&#x2F;start the wings rotating?
评论 #19201548 未加载
zackmorris大约 6 年前
I think there is merit for the last idea in the article - some kind tethered drone array as a windmill using something like autorotation:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Autorotation" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Autorotation</a><p>Similar ideas have been suggested using balloons:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;latesttechnology-world.blogspot.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;07&#x2F;magenn-air-rotor-system-mars_18.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;latesttechnology-world.blogspot.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;07&#x2F;magenn-ai...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nsf.gov&#x2F;discoveries&#x2F;disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=134023" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nsf.gov&#x2F;discoveries&#x2F;disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=134023</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Airborne_wind_turbine" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Airborne_wind_turbine</a><p>An array of wind-powered drones could scale well beyond what&#x27;s possible with a traditional wind turbine, since most of the torque gets applied at the wingtips. There might be advantages with inconsistent wind gusts too, since the rotor could wind up in strong wind and unwind in weak wind. Startup costs would be negligible since a few drones could start the rotor and more could be added as needed. It might even by safer for birds if a drone array turns slower than a fixed rotor.
评论 #19202432 未加载
peter_d_sherman大约 6 年前
Utterly Brilliant!<p>Something like this is sorely needed for bringing broadband to other parts of the world. Best of luck to Justin in this endeavor. I hope he succeeds wildly!
mLuby大约 6 年前
Is the cable portion essential? I&#x27;d think a semi-rigid structure (like they talk about with helicopter blades or glider wings) when under load would survive longer.
评论 #19200742 未加载
carapace大约 6 年前
Er, use the Magnus effect. (Cf. &quot;Magenn Power, Inc.&quot; company, now apparently defunct.)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Magnus_effect" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Magnus_effect</a><p>I&#x27;ve been playing with geodesic cellular kites, and &quot;eternal&quot; flight is certainly possible. If the ratio of surface area to mass is great enough it&#x27;s actually hard to stay on the ground. Cellular kites scale. I would like to eventually make flying buildings, etc...
评论 #19204590 未加载
vpribish大约 6 年前
clever design, but that video was awful. It came across as either ill-informed or misleading - and the beige - oh my, the beige.
评论 #19211107 未加载
everyone大约 6 年前
Why not use a balloon? or dirigible or something like that?
JackFr大约 6 年前
Balloons?
opless大约 6 年前
Is this &quot;solar freaking roadways&quot;, but for UAVs ?
评论 #19201584 未加载