TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The 2 Simple Reasons the Soviet Union Was Doomed to Fail

86 点作者 tvorryn超过 14 年前

10 条评论

elblanco超过 14 年前
A fun bit of history I learned from a retired Soviet Analyst...My analyst friend learned of this years later from his Russian counterpart, after finally being allowed to visit the country he had studied for so long so I'm guessing it's pretty accurate.<p>Sometime in the 80's, the Soviets brought in some Japanese industrial consultants as part of a modernization push for Soviet factories -- they had started to become aware that the sophistication of their industrial capabilities had more or less stagnated somewhere in the 1940's or 50's. Feeling pressure from an increasingly sophisticated U.S. and Europe, they wanted to know what it would take to catch up with the Japanese, then widely considered to have the best, most sophisticated manufacturing processes in the world.<p>The consultants came and toured some of the major manufacturing cities and facilities, taking notes, interviewing workers and managers, testing final output and raw materials quality, crunching numbers, analyzing the supply chain, that sort of thing. Finally they met with the Soviet leadership in Sverdlovsk (now Yekaterinburg), home of some of the major industrial capacity of the Union.<p>After reviewing the findings for several hours, one of the Soviets, impatient with all the details finally spoke up, "yes yes yes...we know all this...what we want to know is, how long will it take, if we put all of our national resources behind it (meaning, a space race level effort), for us to catch up with the Japanese?"<p>Their reply?<p>"Forever"<p>Their analysis revealed that the systemic and social issues in the Soviet Union (as well as a combination of material resources and other odds and ends) were so bad, that no matter how much effort the Soviets put into upgrading their manufacturing processes, and no matter how long they put that effort forward, the Japanese would always be ahead.<p>The consultants were quickly rushed out of the country and the study was never spoken of again.<p>Within the decade, the Union had fallen and it was all a moot point anyway.
评论 #1921773 未加载
forinti超过 14 年前
I'm not advocating communism, but if you look at the Soviet Union as a process, it did manage to turn an agrarian society (feudal, actually) into an industrialized one in 70 years. It's quite a feat, even more so if you consider the destruction they suffered in WWII.
评论 #1921598 未加载
评论 #1921697 未加载
评论 #1922052 未加载
评论 #1921311 未加载
评论 #1922192 未加载
iwr超过 14 年前
The inevitable failure happened not because of particular details that the central planners disregarded, but because there WERE planners in the first place. The market has a network-optimality aspect to it that a monolithic institution cannot replicate.<p>Read more: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem</a>
评论 #1921023 未加载
评论 #1920998 未加载
评论 #1920924 未加载
ThomPete超过 14 年前
There is a theory (can't remember where I head or read it) that one of the main reasons the soviet union fell apart was that the number of phones installed in private homes increased to a point where it was impossible for the KGB to monitor and therefore to suppress with propaganda.<p>I have tried to see if I could find any numbers on phone installations up to the fall but haven't found any.<p>Also according to one of the main KGB execs the SDI program was when they realized that they weren't able to compete with the US anymore.<p>Ironically the SDI project besides from it being impossible to implement, had it been fully implemented, it would have cribbled the US economy too.<p>There is also a nice quite from Arthur C. Clarke about the SDI project in which he observed that any system as powerful as the vision of the SDI project would be more dangerous in itself than the dangers it was supposed to protect against.
评论 #1925420 未加载
评论 #1922157 未加载
评论 #1925422 未加载
arethuza超过 14 年前
Richard Rhodes book "The Arsenals of Folly" covers the lead up to the fall of the Soviet Union from the perspective of the leaders negotiating to reduce levels of nuclear weapons. It also covers some of the fundamental economic problems the Soviets had:<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Arsenals-Folly-Making-Nuclear-Vintage/dp/0375713948" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Arsenals-Folly-Making-Nuclear-Vintage/...</a>
lionhearted超过 14 年前
Good article, misleading title. Lots of interesting information.<p>The article is fairly serious, but has some dry humor mixed in. This line was the funniest:<p>&#62; In the 1970s and early 1980s, the Soviet leadership, however, was not intellectually prepared to heed lessons from the School of Salamanca. The shortest quotation about the intellectual capacity of the Soviet leadership came from the Politburo minutes: "Mr. Zasiadko has stopped binge drinking. Resolution: nominate Mr. Zasiadko as a minister to Ukraine."
评论 #1921138 未加载
protomyth超过 14 年前
One of the lessons of the USSR, your leader saying something is so and shooting / exiling everyone who says different does not make for a prosperous, sustainable government.
评论 #1922005 未加载
评论 #1922312 未加载
johngalt超过 14 年前
1. Socialism 2. Totalitarianism
评论 #1922403 未加载
listic超过 14 年前
Yegor Gaidar's book is on Amazon:<p>"Collapse of an Empire: Lessons for Modern Russia" <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Collapse-Empire-Lessons-Modern-Russia/dp/0815731140/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Collapse-Empire-Lessons-Modern-Russia/...</a><p>The description and reviews are very comprehensive.
petercooper超过 14 年前
Fixed prices and a layer of red tape that caused resources not to be managed efficiently.