Is anybody else here still really confused by USB-IF's decisions recently? From what I can tell:<p>Formerly-USB_3.0 was "USB_3.1 Gen1" is now <i>USB 3.1</i><p>Formerly-USB_3.1 was "USB_3.1 Gen2" is now <i>USB 3.2 Gen2</i><p>The new thing, which is essentially a double-width now-<i>USB-3.2 Gen2</i> bus, is <i>USB Gen2x2</i>"<p>Mix this with a new connector, and we now have:<p>USB-type-C, <i>but it's actually USB-2.0 in a Type-C connector</i><p>USB-type-C Thunderbolt, which is USB-type-C plus Thunderbolt, which can then carry DisplayPort.<p>USB-type-C:<p>and probably a million different implementations of power over USB-type-C.<p>Dear Intel, please keep the Thunderbolt name and numbering scheme!<p>Thunderbolt (1) (Mini-DisplayPort connector)<p>Thunderbolt 2 (Mini-DisplayPort connector)<p>Thunderbolt 3 (uses USB-Type C)<p>Theirs is <i>so</i> much better.<p><i>Edited more than once for formatting.</i>