TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Southwest Boeing 737 Max Makes Emergency Landing at Orlando International

38 点作者 high_derivative大约 6 年前

7 条评论

alkonaut大约 6 年前
So:<p>- this was (per FAA) a regular engine problem and seems unrelated to the MAX control issues. As such it could have happened to any flight.<p>- Since people have asked repeatedly: 737MAX can still fly, just not regular passenger traffic. Airlines now shuffle them around to where they want them (where there is room to store them, where they can get necessary fixes quickly once they are available etc. Typically a hub airport for the airline in question).<p>All in all this was a pretty uninteresting event.
评论 #19496264 未加载
coob大约 6 年前
&gt; after one crashed in Nairobi<p>The Ethiopian Airways flight crashed outside of Addis Ababa - in a whole other country.
评论 #19496260 未加载
dopamean大约 6 年前
This seems like a non story... The plane turned back because of engine trouble. Sounds pretty routine to me.
dordoka大约 6 年前
Playback of flight: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.flightradar24.com&#x2F;data&#x2F;flights&#x2F;wn8701#1ff0449a" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.flightradar24.com&#x2F;data&#x2F;flights&#x2F;wn8701#1ff0449a</a>
评论 #19496544 未加载
misterprime大约 6 年前
The brief article does not list what type of 737 Max this was. I know type 8 and 9 were grounded. I&#x27;m assuming this is a different type, but am unsure.<p><i>edit</i> the playback linked by a different user shows that it was a Max 8. Why wasn&#x27;t this grounded?
评论 #19496176 未加载
评论 #19496167 未加载
评论 #19496162 未加载
broken_symlink大约 6 年前
I don&#x27;t know exactly how grounding works, but is there a reason why the plane can&#x27;t just stay in Orlando?
评论 #19496156 未加载
评论 #19496257 未加载
评论 #19496152 未加载
评论 #19496151 未加载
评论 #19496154 未加载
ronilan大约 6 年前
TLDR: <i>The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said the plane experienced an engine problem.</i>