TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences (1960) [pdf]

113 点作者 truth_seeker大约 6 年前

9 条评论

usgroup大约 6 年前
I think so much maths comes from thinking about science; really self evident with the development of calculus, statistics, LA, formal logics, etc.<p>It’s not like there is maths and there is science and it’s shocking that maths applies to science because the two came up independently: they are confounded by each other.
whatshisface大约 6 年前
Math is as far as we can tell a totally universal building kit for anything we want to set up, all the way from elegant models like Newton&#x27;s laws to billion-parameter monster neural networks. The surprise is not so much the unreasonable effectiveness of math as it is the unreasonable simplicity of fundamental physics.
评论 #19589616 未加载
评论 #19590686 未加载
评论 #19590674 未加载
评论 #19589753 未加载
评论 #19590147 未加载
评论 #19589540 未加载
评论 #19590129 未加载
dang大约 6 年前
2017: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13954804" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13954804</a><p>2014: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=8520610" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=8520610</a>
评论 #19589657 未加载
lordnacho大约 6 年前
The question I&#x27;d ask is if you found a description of nature, is there any chance it would be called not-math yet still describe the phenomenon in question?<p>Is there any example of something that isn&#x27;t considered math but describes nature?<p>Isn&#x27;t there a tendency for math to grow with science too?
评论 #19590467 未加载
评论 #19589801 未加载
评论 #19589921 未加载
kumarvvr大约 6 年前
Is the question<p>&quot;Is math behind everything or is that anything can be explained with math?&quot;<p>a valid question?<p>Even for &quot;chaos&quot; we have a chaos theory. Where we cannot apply function&#x2F;formulae to physical phenomenon, math tends to use empirical calculation and theory to study systems.<p>Is is that the universe bends to math or math bends to the universe?
评论 #19590756 未加载
评论 #19590781 未加载
victor106大约 6 年前
An amazing book I’ve been reading is<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Infinite-Powers-Calculus-Reveals-Universe&#x2F;dp&#x2F;1328879984&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Infinite-Powers-Calculus-Reveals-Univ...</a><p>The author explains the history of calculus leading up to Newton’s treatise on Calculus and how important calculus is to modern life. It’s behind everything you use from cell phones to containing HIV. Highly recommended.
_bxg1大约 6 年前
Reminds me of this:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;HEfHFsfGXjs" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;HEfHFsfGXjs</a>
choonway大约 6 年前
That&#x27;s because everything can be approximated with maths. Even with shoewhat random events you can tame it with statistics.
air7大约 6 年前
If ever there was a argument for Intelligent Design, this would be it.
评论 #19594050 未加载
评论 #19591002 未加载