TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

737: The Max Mess

35 点作者 breadbox大约 6 年前

5 条评论

PaulHoule大约 6 年前
A comparison to the A320 is in order.<p>The A320 (as well as modern Boeing Airliners like the 777 and 787) has a comprehensive system of &quot;flight envelope protection&quot; which automatically acts to keep things like a pitch runaway from happening.<p>In a modern aircraft, flight envelope protection is closely integrated with the fly-by-wire system in normal operation. If sensors are degraded, the system reverts to a &quot;control rule&quot; which has less protection.<p>In the case of the 737 they retrofitted a partial flight envelope protection system onto an old aircraft. Thus it wasn&#x27;t properly designed, tested, and pilots not trained how to use it.
评论 #19610396 未加载
评论 #19610354 未加载
jayess大约 6 年前
&gt; By the time of the Ethiopian crash, 737 pilots everywhere knew all about MCAS and the procedure for disabling it. A preliminary report issued last week by Ethiopian Airlines indicates that after a few minutes of wrestling with the control yoke, the pilots on Flight 302 did invoke the checklist procedure, and moved the STAB TRIM switches to CUTOUT. The stabilizer then stopped responding to MCAS nose-down commands, but the pilots were unable to regain control of the airplane.<p>&gt; It’s not entirely clear why they failed or what was going on in the cockpit in those last minutes. One factor may be that the cutout switch disables not only automatic pitch trim movements but also manual ones requested through the buttons on the control yoke. The switch cuts all power to the electric motor that moves the stabilizer. In this situation the only way to adjust the trim is to turn the hand crank wheels near the pilots’ knees.<p>Wow, so disabling MCAS also disables <i>all</i> stabilizer commands?
评论 #19610438 未加载
评论 #19610409 未加载
评论 #19610412 未加载
评论 #19612467 未加载
cjbprime大约 6 年前
Great article! The only thing missing is a discussion of whether manual retrim after disabling the stabilizer trim motor was actually possible given the aerodynamic constraints. This theory&#x27;s been discussed quite a bit here on HN and pilot forums.<p>The theory is that, on the Ethiopian flight, after disabling the stabilizer trim motor while there is mistrim, the aerodynamic load on the jackscrew was too great for it be movable by the copilot using their crank. The pilot was perhaps using their strength to pull the yoke back, which meant both that he was unavailable to help crank, and that the aerodynamic load was increased by the elevator directing airflow in opposition to the stabilizer.<p>There is an old “yo-yo maneuver” that stopped being mentioned in Boeing manuals decades ago that describes having to relieve load on the stabilizer before manually trimming, in this case by releasing the elevator and pushing the nose down even further, which I’m sure would have been very unattractive given their high airspeed and low altitude if the pilots even understood the procedure, which is no longer part of simulator training.<p>This may explain why the trim motor appears to have been re-enabled towards the end of the Ethiopian flight: because purely manual trim was impossible.
huslage大约 6 年前
This is dangerous conjecture at best. I&#x27;m a little sick of reading that MCAS shouldn&#x27;t exist.<p>MCAS must exist.<p>The flight regime where MCAS would need to act should be exceedingly rare. The bug isn&#x27;t that MCAS exists. The bug is that there is a failure in the code&#x2F;inputs to the system which allow it to trigger in regimes where it shouldn&#x27;t.
评论 #19610626 未加载
gonvaled大约 6 年前
It took China for once having an independent policy instead of &quot;impartial&quot; agencies pushing their agenda onto a defenseless world.<p>May I remember that most HN jumped to defend Boeing and the FAA, without a shred of evidence?<p>I welcome our Chinese overlords.<p>Competition is good.
评论 #19610401 未加载
评论 #19610379 未加载
评论 #19610332 未加载