TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Cold plasma can inactivate or remove airborne viruses, UMich study shows

75 点作者 arto大约 6 年前

9 条评论

giardini大约 6 年前
Sounds like &quot;air ionizers&quot;:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Air_ioniser#Ions_versus_ozone" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Air_ioniser#Ions_versus_ozone</a><p>see also &quot;Ions versus ozone&quot; (part of the same article):<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Air_ioniser#Ions_versus_ozone" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Air_ioniser#Ions_versus_ozone</a><p>I&#x27;m fairly certain any plasma is harder to create than ionized air and the plasma could be maintained only in a relatively small confined space, whereas ions can be freely distributed into a room.<p>Air ionizers are one option used for cleaning up black mold, fungus, etc. when a building suffers water damage. They&#x27;re sometimes used to &quot;mop up&quot; after the usual methods of cleaning (washing with anti-fungals, antiseptics, etc.) have been exhausted.<p>Turn on the ionizer, keep the air circulating, and periodically measure cooties (fungus, bacteria, germs, viruses, etc.) until levels are below tolerance. You leave the premises if using an ozone generator but some models claim to limit ionization to the unit itself, in which case you should be able to live on the premises. Any released ionized particles travel to the remotest parts of the air circulation system for mop-up.<p>Its old tech that has existed almost since the first spark coil.
userbinator大约 6 年前
<i>“In those void spaces, you’re initiating sparks,” Clack said. “By passing through the packed bed, pathogens in the air stream are oxidized by unstable atoms called radicals. What’s left is a virus that has diminished ability to infect cells.”</i><p>That sounds just like ozone sterilisation, something that&#x27;s been around for a very long time. What&#x27;s new about this variation?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Dielectric_barrier_discharge" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Dielectric_barrier_discharge</a>
评论 #19613784 未加载
mateo1大约 6 年前
In order for those &quot;soft kill&quot; technologies to work, you need to get all the &quot;big&quot; particles out of the fluid. Similarly to how potable water needs to be filtered and flocculated before chlorination becomes effective. So while this is an alternative to UV or higher-order filtration, it&#x27;s not replacing filters.
01100011大约 6 年前
Yeah but what do those radicals do to human tissue? Ozone isn&#x27;t all that great for your lungs.
评论 #19613330 未加载
评论 #19613179 未加载
评论 #19613742 未加载
foxyv大约 6 年前
My professor in college was studying this. The big deal was that you could use cold plasma to deactivate bio-films which are resistant to even autoclaving. I guess biofilms are a problem when you are trying to clean hospitals, surgical tools, etc...<p>The only issue was that she needed helium to ignite the cold plasma in the RF generator. Helium is stupid expensive for this sort of thing.
ape4大约 6 年前
All hail the .1%
评论 #19613683 未加载
评论 #19613581 未加载
ilsel大约 6 年前
Yeah, make them immune to that too. Improves the chances of life spreading across universe.
评论 #19614307 未加载
tsmarsh大约 6 年前
Seems like a really good way of creating a niche for plasma proof viruses.
asaddhamani大约 6 年前
Could this lead to mutated super-viruses?
评论 #19613535 未加载
评论 #19613582 未加载
评论 #19613539 未加载