TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Most ideal size for a Web Site?

14 点作者 rockstar9大约 17 年前

4 条评论

mattmaroon大约 17 年前
One terrible thing about variable-width sites is that they tend to fall apart when you do a full-page zoom like what is built into ie7 (and I've heard Firefox3). Go to Gmail or Google Reader and hit ctrl+. It rapidly becomes a jumbled mess. Conceptually, I'm not sure how a browser developer can really deal with such a thing either.<p>I run a sports site, which is the bottom of the technological heap, and only 3% of viewers have 800x600 res or below. Google Analytics provides this data. Use it.<p>I think presenting a better page to 97% and making 3% side scroll is probably a net win. The guy acts like anyone who has to side scroll will just be unable to use your site, though I'd suspect someone with an 800x600 screen is probably used to it.
评论 #199938 未加载
karzeem大约 17 年前
I tend to prefer variable width in my own work, but there are plenty of fixed-width sites whose designs I respect (apple.com, for one). Setting aside mobile interfaces, you can safely go 1000 pixels wide. Of course, your lines of text shouldn't be that long -- you'll find few people advocating more than 100 characters on a line, especially for long blocks of text.<p>The short answer, then, is that the type of site you're doing is more relevant than some global preference.
chrisbroadfoot大约 17 年前
The other thing to factor in is that not everyone browses with their window fullsize.
edw519大约 17 年前
"Most ideal size for a Web Site?"<p>If you're blogging, doesn't matter.<p>If you're selling something, you try to capture as much share as you reasonably can.<p>But if you claim to be an expert in web design/development, your site better render perfectly, no matter what I arrive with. If it doesn't, you lose your credibility, and the only thing that really matters is, "Where's the back button?"