TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Has anyone successfully relied on advertising for revenue?

7 点作者 _davebennett大约 6 年前
It seems like advertising might be the worst business model to have in 2019. Any success stories?

4 条评论

sharmi大约 6 年前
If you do not get approved by adsense, it is not an viable option.<p>I have a site with views in the millions, but no adsense. Adding any other ad delivery service creates a lot of spam and makes the website yuck. And the payout is orders of magnitude less than adsense. So i have just foregone ads and host on my own cost.<p>Getting into Adsense is becoming difficult and there are lots of horror stories of them randomly suspending accounts without payouts.
评论 #19808611 未加载
评论 #19805476 未加载
stevesearer大约 6 年前
Office Snapshots (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;officesnapshots.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;officesnapshots.com</a>) here.<p>We switched away from ad networks ~5 years ago in favor of selling and hosting our own ads which are static jpg&#x2F;pngs.<p>Our ads are matched against the content (office furniture ads on office design content) which still targets the reader in a roundabout way in that they will likely be interested in the ads if they are interested in the content.<p>There are several benefits including faster site, keeping 100% of the revenue, and getting to control the quality of ads to ensure a great experience for our readers.<p>We have also been removing 3rd party scripts (share buttons, etc) over the last year or so and only have Google Analytics and a Google Font left. The site still works if you block them.
sgillen大约 6 年前
Maybe I’m confused by your question. I believe Google and Facebook rely on ads for most of their revenue.
评论 #19795384 未加载
return1大约 6 年前
From my experience, eCPMs have not gone down in the past 10 years, at least for adsense . Which means that ads are not a worse monetization than it was in the past if that&#x27;s what you are asking.